Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-12 Thread Rudy (bulk)
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello networkers, I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones) a new CARP implementation. Super! I'll use it but am not brave enough for alpha. Maybe beta. :) Will this support multiple VHID per interface? Rudy _

Re: Odd TCP RFC1323 Behavior

2011-08-12 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Chip Marshall wrote: > I've been digging into an issue with SSH throughput and > discovered that one of the servers involved isn't using RFC1323 > window scaling and timestamps. > > The server is running 7.3-RELEASE-p3, and has > net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 set to 1. > >

Odd TCP RFC1323 Behavior

2011-08-12 Thread Chip Marshall
I've been digging into an issue with SSH throughput and discovered that one of the servers involved isn't using RFC1323 window scaling and timestamps. The server is running 7.3-RELEASE-p3, and has net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 set to 1. When connecting out from the server, it sets both Window Scale and Ti

panic: m_uiotombuf: progress != total

2011-08-12 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hi. Just after upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0 kernel panics: panic: m_uiotombuf: progress != total cpuid = 1 KDB: enter: panic [ thread pid 1194 tid 100132 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3b: movq$0,0x913242(%rip) db> bt Tracing pid 1194 tid 100132 td 0xfe0005c8f8c0 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3b

Re: tcp failing to recover from a packet loss under 8.2-RELEASE?

2011-08-12 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:33:37PM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >> >>> Autotunig w/o limits is bad idea. This is way to DoS. >> >> >> >> Depends how it is implemented. With appropriate backpressure mechanisms >> >> put in place,