Re: kern/159294: [em] em watchdog timeouts

2011-07-29 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: em watchdog timeouts New Synopsis: [em] em watchdog timeouts Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 29 20:42:18 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer

Re: m_pkthdr.rcvif dangling pointer problem

2011-07-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 7/14/11 8:44 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hi! This problem is definitely known and is as old as network stack is parallel. Those, who know the problem may skip to next paragraph. Short description is the following: every mbuf that is allocated in an interface receive procedure has a field w

Re: FIB separation

2011-07-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 7/16/11 9:19 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiroki Sato wrote: Vlad Galu wrote in: du> Hello, du> du> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced du> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that

Re: LOR with nfsclient "sillyrename"

2011-07-29 Thread Jeremiah Lott
On Jul 22, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Please try the attached patch (which is also at): > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/oldsilly.patch > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/newsilly.patch > (for the old and new clients in -current, respectively) > > - I think oldsilly.patch

kern/159103

2011-07-29 Thread Rashid N. Achilov
Additional data: First. Tio obtain bug you should place "lo0" as latest member of network interfaces set, i.e: network_interfaces="xl0 lo0" - bug will occured network_interfaces="lo0 xl0" - bug will not occured network_interfaces="xl0" - bug also will not occured Second. To eliminate bug you mu

Re: bin/136661: [patch] ndp(8) ignores -f option

2011-07-29 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
The following reply was made to PR bin/136661; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Kandaurov To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, melif...@ipfw.ru Cc: Subject: Re: bin/136661: [patch] ndp(8) ignores -f option Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:47:28 +0400 The '-f' argument parsing was (accidentally?) re

bin/121359

2011-07-29 Thread Maxim Konovalov
The following reply was made to PR bin/121359; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: bin/121359 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:53:19 +0400 (MSD) Try the following patch (ported from OpenBSD): Index: systems.c ===

Re: kern/109308: [pppd] [panic] Multiple panics kernel ppp suspected [regression]

2011-07-29 Thread maxim
Synopsis: [pppd] [panic] Multiple panics kernel ppp suspected [regression] State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: maxim State-Changed-When: Fri Jul 29 08:07:19 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: pppd(8) and its kernel code was removed from the base long time ago. http://www.freebsd.org/c