On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:37:53AM +0200, Per von Zweigbergk wrote:
> 3 jun 2011 kl. 00.10 skrev Patrick Lamaiziere:
>
> > You may want to implement your own control because if the two hosts
> > cannot communicate, you will have two masters. This can happen if the
> > links on the both hosts are u
On 6/2/2011 8:14 PM, John De Boskey wrote:
- Patrick Lamaiziere's Original Message -
Le Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0400,
John a ?crit :
Instead of running carp on the external interfaces as below:
ifconfig_cxgb0="inet 10.24.99.11 netmask 255.255.0.0" # System 1
physical ip ifconf
3 jun 2011 kl. 00.10 skrev Patrick Lamaiziere:
> You may want to implement your own control because if the two hosts
> cannot communicate, you will have two masters. This can happen if the
> links on the both hosts are up, but none packet are forwarded (ie the
> switch connecting the two boxes is
- Patrick Lamaiziere's Original Message -
> Le Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0400,
> John a ?crit :
>
> >Instead of running carp on the external interfaces as below:
> >
> > ifconfig_cxgb0="inet 10.24.99.11 netmask 255.255.0.0" # System 1
> > physical ip ifconfig_cxgb0="inet 10.24.99.12
Hi Luigi,
> we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
> FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
> very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
> modified ixgbe driver, which gives plenty of CPU cycles to handle
> multiple interfa
Hello,
This is very interesting and thank you for sharing.
On 6/2/11, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
> FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
> very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:10:36AM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0400,
> John a ?crit :
>
> Hello,
>
> >However, if system A is the MASTER, and system B is rebooted,
> > the carp interface on system A will flip/flop going down and
> > coming back up which is
Le Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0400,
John a écrit :
>Instead of running carp on the external interfaces as below:
>
> ifconfig_cxgb0="inet 10.24.99.11 netmask 255.255.0.0" # System 1
> physical ip ifconfig_cxgb0="inet 10.24.99.12 netmask 255.255.0.0" #
> System 2 physcial ip ifconfig_carp1=
Le Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:39:40 -0400,
John a écrit :
Hello,
>However, if system A is the MASTER, and system B is rebooted,
> the carp interface on system A will flip/flop going down and
> coming back up which is not what I want.
I saw this if the switch connecting the two systems takes some ti
Hi,
we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
modified ixgbe driver, which gives plenty of CPU cycles to handle
multiple interface and/or do usef
Hi Folks,
Posting to -net & -fs to hopefully catch the right folks.
A similar posting to -current didn't seem to catch anyones
interest. Please respond as approriate.
I'm in the process of setting up HA/Failover ZFS server
systems using carp. I seem to be running into some issues that
may
11 matches
Mail list logo