Old Synopsis: ipfw/dummynet: performance improvement and several extensions
New Synopsis: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement and several
extensions
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 3 06:50:31 U
Old Synopsis: em0 fails to init on CURRENT after March 17
New Synopsis: [em] em0 fails to init on CURRENT after March 17
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 3 06:12:14 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to ma
It's tunable. Set net.link.ifqmaxlen.
I know it's tunable at boot time; I mean why is it that low by default?
and what will be acceptable value for ASDL connections 8 and more MBit/s?
Maybe that depends on traffic pattern. I agree default value is too
low but I don't know what would be bes
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:07AM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> > interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
> >
> > > uname -a
> > FreeBSD 8.2-ST
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:49:47PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> Adrian Chadd (adr...@freebsd.org) [11.05.01 09:09] wrote:
> > On 1 May 2011 04:43, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >
> > > It's tunable. Set net.link.ifqmaxlen.
> >
> > I know it's tunable at boot time; I mean why is it that low by defa
Hi,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Li, Qing wrote:
> Please give this patch a try for IPv4 ARP
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/arp2.patch
>
Your patch works; the manually added address is kept upon a up/down/up
transition. However, the interface address is still flush, which I
find inconsi
Nailed it, thank you ... I've used this one in the past, and it was
fantastic then .. .couldn't recall the name, and when I did a 'grep -i
snmp' in the descr files under net-mgmt, wasn't finding that one :(
Thx ...
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:55:11PM -
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Would like to find something that runs on FreeBSD that I can use to map our
> network, preferrably dumping to a database, and grabbing information like:
> interface / ip / cpus / hostname, etc ...
>
> Server needs to run on FreeBSD ...
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:55:11PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Would like to find something that runs on FreeBSD that I can use to map
> our network, preferrably dumping to a database, and grabbing
> information like: interface / ip / cpus / hostname, etc ...
>
> Server needs to run on F
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
This line from the OpenBSD 4.9 release notes attracted my attention :
"A radix tree sorting bug was fixed, which results in significant
improvements to IPsec performance under certain conditions.|
And this seems to be the relevant commit :
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/rad
Please give this patch a try for IPv4 ARP
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/arp2.patch
--Qing
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] on behalf
of Li, Qing
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 12:45 AM
To: Arnaud Lacombe
Cc: freebsd-net
On Monday, May 02, 2011 09:34:31 Brandon Gooch wrote:
> 2011/5/2 Bernhard Schmidt :
> > On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >>
Your patch doesn't work because the in_lltable_prefix_free() is a generic
function.
The static entries are kept only when issuing if-down command, however, if the
interface
address is being removed, permanent static entries are gone and have to be
reinstalled.
I already have a working patch
Hi,
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Li, Qing wrote:
> jeez, this bug has been around for quite a while ...
>
> Please try patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/arp.patch
>
d'oh!... Concerning Ingo's bug, your patch do the job, my report was
bad, 4.9-RELEASE and 7.x show the same behavior:
2011/5/2 Bernhard Schmidt :
> On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well,
>>
On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well,
> >> there is still an issue somewhere wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
