On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 07:48:51PM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The bge driver doesn't support this chipset yet and I was wondering if
> anyone has looked at implementing it.
>
> NetBSD looks like it has support for it. Now I may be wrong here, but
> it appears that the BCM57765 is simi
Hello, J..
You wrote 19 апреля 2011 г., 23:20:16:
> PS: If you sysctl net.inet6.ip6.auto_linklocal=1 and bring the interface
> down and back up you will end up with a link-local address on the
> interface.
Oh, it is what I need. Thank you.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 19 апреля 2011 г., 22:48:39:
>>ifconfig shows only one "inet6" address for each (manually
>> configured), and these nd6 flags:
>>nd6 options=3
> Re-read what I wrote above. You've got to enable the link-local
> addresses for each interface.
man ifconfig has only on
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:48:39AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>On 4/19/2011 11:39 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>>Hello, Doug.
>>You wrote 19 2011 ??., 22:01:20:
>>
I'm looking for way to setup IPv6 router config on IPv4-configured
node without reboot.
>>>Your best bet is actua
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:06 PM, K. Macy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, K. Macy wrote:
I'm not able to find IFNET_MULTIQUEUE in a recent 8.2-STABLE, is this
something
present only in HEAD?
>>>
>>> It looks like i
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, K. Macy wrote:
>>> I'm not able to find IFNET_MULTIQUEUE in a recent 8.2-STABLE, is this
>>> something
>>> present only in HEAD?
>>
>> It looks like it is now EM_MULTIQUEUE.
>
> Just curious, how would one en
Hi,
The bge driver doesn't support this chipset yet and I was wondering if
anyone has looked at implementing it.
NetBSD looks like it has support for it. Now I may be wrong here, but
it appears that the BCM57765 is similar to other devices based on the
NetBSD if_bge.c source version 1.194.
I've
On 4/19/2011 11:39 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 19 апреля 2011 г., 22:01:20:
I'm looking for way to setup IPv6 router config on IPv4-configured
node without reboot.
Your best bet is actually to reboot. There are a lot of moving parts,
and it's difficult to catch them a
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 19 апреля 2011 г., 22:01:20:
>>I'm looking for way to setup IPv6 router config on IPv4-configured
>> node without reboot.
> Your best bet is actually to reboot. There are a lot of moving parts,
> and it's difficult to catch them all, especially with a gateway setup.
Do
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, K. Macy wrote:
>> I'm not able to find IFNET_MULTIQUEUE in a recent 8.2-STABLE, is this
>> something
>> present only in HEAD?
>
> It looks like it is now EM_MULTIQUEUE.
Just curious, how would one enable this to test it? We have igb(4)
interfaces in our new stor
On 4/19/2011 10:18 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
I'm looking for way to setup IPv6 router config on IPv4-configured
node without reboot.
Your best bet is actually to reboot. There are a lot of moving parts,
and it's difficult to catch them all, especially with a gateway s
Hello, Freebsd-net.
I'm looking for way to setup IPv6 router config on IPv4-configured
node without reboot.
I've added to /etc/rc.conf:
ipv6_enable="YES"
ipv6_ifconfig_em0="2001:470::1::1 prefixlen 64"
ipv6_ifconfig_wlan0="2001:470::2::1 prefixlen 64"
ipv6_defaultrouter="2001:470:xx
The patch at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/Sandvine/STABLE_8/tcp_signature/tcp_signature.diff
- Enable the md5 signature checking for incoming packets, when both
enabled in the kernel and desired by the socket
- Spit out an error when the option TCP_SIGNATURE is enabled and IPSEC
option is not
> Hi,
>
> I'm not able to find IFNET_MULTIQUEUE in a recent 8.2-STABLE, is this
> something
> present only in HEAD?
It looks like it is now EM_MULTIQUEUE.
Cheers
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On Apr 18, 2011, at 8:59 PM, K. Macy wrote:
> It occurred to me that I should add a couple of qualifications to the
> previous statements. 1.6Mpps is line rate for GigE and I only know of
> it to be achievable by igb hardware. The most I've seen em hardware
> achieve is 1.1Mpps. Furthermore, in or
15 matches
Mail list logo