Hello,
It looks like IPv6 neighbor discovery, due to recent changes, doesn't
work correctly for me on HEAD.
I don't fully understand the nature of the problem (which obviously
results in connectivity problems with neighboring hosts), but the
most obvious symptom is missing ethernet addresses in N
Hi,
"wrong" alert - found the answer by myself.
Bye,
Ingo
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
in sys/netinet/ip_output.c at the end of ip_output:
done:
if (ro == &iproute && ro->ro_rt && !nortfree) {
RTFREE(ro->ro_rt);
}
ro->ro_rt gets freed, if not from flowtable.
but in sys/netinet/ip_input.c, ip_forward after ip_output is called:
error = ip_output(m
Old Synopsis: Lagg failover does not announce the failover to switch
New Synopsis: [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 6 20:38:58 UTC 2011
Responsible-Change
Uhm ... what was the intended content of your message?
And ... the RADIX_MPATH code is now considerably more flexible than just ECMP.
-Kip
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:10 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> Hmmm funny, seems the mailing list is now stripping my address and
> moving posts to the top.
>
> O
Hmmm funny, seems the mailing list is now stripping my address and
moving posts to the top.
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:15:19PM +0200, K. Macy wrote:
> The weights of the links can be changed at run time. If one link is
> not passing traffic its weight should be set to zero until such time
> as it
On Apr 6, 2011, at 1:09 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> People tend to take advantage of the resources they have; if you
>> have an EMC or NetApp filer handy, it's might well be reasonable
>> to use it ...
>
> s/reasonable/tempting/
>
> "When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem
The weights of the links can be changed at run time. If one link is
not passing traffic its weight should be set to zero until such time
as it is passing traffic again.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011
On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:02 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:45:54PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
>>> On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
Hi!
Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple g
The following reply was made to PR kern/153671; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eugene Grosbein
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Gleb Smirnoff
Subject: kern/153671: [em] [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE repeatable kernel in if_em(4)
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:41:07 +0700
Hi!
I have been testing some
The following reply was made to PR kern/153255; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eugene Grosbein
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Gleb Smirnoff
Subject: Re: kern/153255: [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE repeatable kernel panic under
heavy network load
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:40:29 +0700
Hi!
I hav
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:02 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:45:54PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
>> On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw
>> > capabilities of FreeBSD?
>> > I have dual homed
Hi,
regarding multipath problems:
Setup which should work:
++ ++
|Router A|(ospf)|Router B|
++ ++
|(carp)|(carp)
| |
+--+---+
|
La
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:45:54PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw
> > capabilities of FreeBSD?
> > I have dual homed FreeBSD box, one interface ISP1 another ISP2 :
> > 1) can I b
Eir Nym wrote:
On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
Hi!
Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw capabilities of
FreeBSD?
I have dual homed FreeBSD box, one interface ISP1 another ISP2 :
1) can I balance outgoing traffic across them ?
2) Is there support of any
On 6 April 2011 15:05, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 6 April 2011 11:35, Dominique Goncalves
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've installed FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE on soekris net4801 with Atheros
>> 9280 (mini pci card) as an access point using hostapd, so far it works
>> . Sometimes I need to disable wireless
On 6 April 2011 11:35, Dominique Goncalves
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE on soekris net4801 with Atheros
> 9280 (mini pci card) as an access point using hostapd, so far it works
> . Sometimes I need to disable wireless with ifconfig wlan0 down but
> each times I run ifconfig
On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw capabilities
> of FreeBSD?
> I have dual homed FreeBSD box, one interface ISP1 another ISP2 :
> 1) can I balance outgoing traffic across them ?
> 2) Is there support of any kind
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> People tend to take advantage of the resources they have; if you
> have an EMC or NetApp filer handy, it's might well be reasonable
> to use it ...
s/reasonable/tempting/
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem tends to
resemble a nail."
___
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE on soekris net4801 with Atheros
9280 (mini pci card) as an access point using hostapd, so far it works
. Sometimes I need to disable wireless with ifconfig wlan0 down but
each times I run ifconfig wlan0 up, the kernel produces this error
ifa_add_loopback_rou
20 matches
Mail list logo
