On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Dave Johnson wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2
>
> An help gladly accepted
>
> LOG ON
>
> Flushed all rules.
> 00010 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 via lo0
> 00030 divert 8668 ip from any to any via bge0
> ipfw
>
> On 7 March 2011 07:27, daren wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd
> really
> > appreciate it if you'd update to -HE
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
>> caused
>> the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
>> just le
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
> caused
> the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
> just let it
> keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is better :)
>
> Thanks for tes
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, fredrik danerklint wrote:
It's new-arp fallout and related to the carp problems with IPv6.
ok. where can I read about this problem with carp (since that is what I also
gonna to use later on with ip6..)
kern/153848 or ther last weeks on this list.
Is there any kind of i
Hi Jack,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
> caused
> the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
> just let it
> keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is better :)
>
> Than
söndagen den 6 mars 2011 21.29.30 skrev Bjoern A. Zeeb:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, fredrik danerklint wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > lördagen den 5 mars 2011 21.10.19 skrev Sergey Kandaurov:
> >> On 5 March 2011 21:43, fredrik danerklint wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to know what is the differen
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, fredrik danerklint wrote:
Hi,
lördagen den 5 mars 2011 21.10.19 skrev Sergey Kandaurov:
On 5 March 2011 21:43, fredrik danerklint wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know what is the differents between ip4 and ip6 for this
command.
First:
#ifconfig lo1
lo1: flags=8049 metric 0
On 7 March 2011 03:21, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
> > start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
>
> Is this all the source?
>
> Old:
> $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c,v 1.300 2011/02/21
On 3/5/11 10:43 AM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know what is the differents between ip4 and ip6 for this
command.
First:
#ifconfig lo1
lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
options=3
inet xx.xx.xx.2 netmask 0x
inet6 2a03:::::xx02 p
Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
caused
the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
just let it
keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is better :)
Thanks for testing it!
Jack
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Özkan KIRIK wr
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
> start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
Is this all the source?
Old:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c,v 1.300 2011/02/21 19:22:45 adrian Exp $
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_debu
2011/3/6 Ian FREISLICH :
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
>> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
>
> Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying to as
Hi all
An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2
An help gladly accepted
LOG ON
Flushed all rules.
00010 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 via lo0
00030 divert 8668 ip from any to any via bge0
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
5 allow ip from any to any
Firewa
lördagen den 5 mars 2011 21.10.19 skrev Sergey Kandaurov:
> On 5 March 2011 21:43, fredrik danerklint wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know what is the differents between ip4 and ip6 for this
> > command.
> >
> > First:
> >
> > #ifconfig lo1
> > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> >
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying to associate with
00:30:4f:58:bf:94 (SSI
Which versions did you have stable versus unstable AR9285 behaviour?
I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 6 March 2011 22:24, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
Hello,
I've been testing the em.7.2.2 driver as kld. The system is up about 2
days 6 hours.
System has 4 em interfaces, Throughput is about 200Mbit/s. System
didn't hang, but em2 has Input Errors.
I saw that, dev.em.2.mac_stats.missed_packets is not zero? What could
be the problem?
# uname -r
8.
18 matches
Mail list logo