Old Synopsis: 'media auto' does not work
New Synopsis: [re] 'media auto' does not work
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 2 07:36:30 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reclassify and assign.
http://www.freebsd.o
Old Synopsis: Panic when inject routes in kernel
New Synopsis: [route] [panic] Panic when inject routes in kernel
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 2 07:33:35 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Attempt to classi
Something new in my logs yesterday:
Mar 1 16:06:38 k-45-pc-1 kernel: Accessing freed node node: ID [2e5c7a]: type
'tee', 0 hooks, flags 0x9, 0 refs, mpd11699-vlan373-781-lt:
Mar 1 16:06:38 k-45-pc-1 kernel: Last active @
/home/src/sys/netgraph/ng_base.c, line 2257
Mar 1 16:06:38 k-45-pc-1 ker
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Mike.
> You wrote 1 марта 2011 г., 17:20:49:
>
>> I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
>> say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
> As I wrote to Jack, my NIC hangs
I don't think the TDMA code has been thoroughly tested lately.
The bus shouldn't matter; it's likely the underlying chipset that matters.
It's an AR5424, which should be the AR5212 driver. That should just work
fine. If it's panicing, try to get a sensible panic message and backtrace
showing where
> vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport controls wither or not NFS enforces the
> traditional RPC semantics that require that requests come from
> "privileged" ports. By default this check is disabled. Hardening
> guides typically suggest this be enabled, usually via the rc.conf knob
> nfs_reserved_port_only=YES.
The following reply was made to PR bin/79228; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dan Lukes
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/79228: [patch] extend arp(8) to be able to create blackhole
records
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:05:22 +0100
Not true, it doesn't work in 8.x nor in HEAD.
Hello, Mike.
You wrote 1 марта 2011 г., 17:20:49:
> I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
> say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
As I wrote to Jack, my NIC hangs today with 7.2.2
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
Hello,
I made a post to this list several weeks ago regarding transparent bridging
+ pf + rstp + failover. My experiments with RSTP / MSTP with my switch and
freebsd transparent bridging produced many problems.
So I would like to remove the 'transparent' item out of the equasion and
assign an i
Thank you for your answer. I'll try Adrian's fix.
K.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 03:49:41 Kyungsoo Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > whenever I try to set my mini PCI-e card (Anatel AR5BXB6) as Master
> > (tdmaslot 0), kernel shows PANIC msg like
Synopsis: [cxgb] [patch] cxgb panic calling cxgb_set_lro() without port lock
held
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->np
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 1 10:22:59 EST 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
same as above
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=1
Synopsis: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->hselasky
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 1 10:16:24 EST 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Same as above
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153938
___
Synopsis: [cxgb] [patch] cxgb panic calling cxgb_set_lro() without port lock
held
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 1 10:15:34 EST 2011
State-Changed-Why:
committed in head
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146759
Synopsis: [patch] extend arp(8) to be able to create blackhole records
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 1 10:14:25 EST 2011
State-Changed-Why:
This PR is fixed in head, 8.x and 7.x, but will not be merged to 6.x now
that that branch is unsup
Synopsis: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 1 10:10:55 EST 2011
State-Changed-Why:
committed in head
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153938
___
On Monday, February 28, 2011 10:48:32 am Brooks Davis wrote:
> vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport controls wither or not NFS enforces the
> traditional RPC semantics that require that requests come from
> "privileged" ports. By default this check is disabled. Hardening
> guides typically suggest this be enab
I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
Jan, have you had a chance to try 7.2.2 ? You seemed to hit the issue
the most frequently. There are also some alternate patches in
http://www.freebsd.org/c
The following reply was made to PR kern/155004; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Konstantin Malov
To: "bug-follo...@freebsd.org"
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/155004: [bce] [panic] kernel panic in bce0 driver
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:12:47 +0300
--_000_6C8693CFEE208243A988360589D6145A013697A0A28EKL
Synopsis: [netgraph] [patch] Add XMIT_FAILOVER to ng_one2many
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: ae
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 1 13:14:56 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Commited to head/. Thanks!
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=137775
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:49:29PM +0530, Saurav Dasgupta wrote:
> TCP session is up. By default the rx buffer window size is 64k.Traffic flow
> is fine. When the buffer size is increased while connection is up, rx buffer
> window size is updated automatically with the new value.
> But if we dec
Hi,
We are facing the issue with TCP connection buffer size.
TCP session is up. By default the rx buffer window size is 64k.Traffic flow is
fine. When the buffer size is increased while connection is up, rx buffer
window size is updated automatically with the new value.
But if we decrease the b
Hi,
One of my friends are trying to setup pppoe server with mpd and they
want to give to set of users public IP dynamically and plus traffic
shaping.
However public IPs are limited compared to pppoe clients and they want
have some kind of dynamic NAT (dynamic public IP per number of
clients).
Is i
22 matches
Mail list logo