Hi!
On 25.01.2011 18:25:10 +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> > The reason is in ARP handling code: it looks for an address of the interface
> > belonging to a bridge, but there is not check that a bridge is the same.
> >
> > Attached patch (patch-if_ether.c) fixes the issue.
> >
>
> I tried your
On 26 January 2011 02:32, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've found some issues with the if_bridge on 8.2-PRERELEASE.
>
> 1. An ARP issue
>
> Suppose we have a box with the 4 interfaces: nic0, nic1, nic2, nic3.
> The interfaces are linked pairwise using 2 bridge(4) interfaces: bridge0
> and b
On 1/25/2011 3:32 PM, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
Hi!
I've found some issues with the if_bridge on 8.2-PRERELEASE.
1. An ARP issue
Suppose we have a box with the 4 interfaces: nic0, nic1, nic2, nic3.
The interfaces are linked pairwise using 2 bridge(4) interfaces: bridge0
and bridge1. Only nic0
The following reply was made to PR kern/151593; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Eduardo Schoedler"
To: ,
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/151593: [igb] [panic] Kernel panic when bringing up igb
network adapter with MSI-X enabled
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:22:45 -0200
I have the same problem.
Hi!
On 25.01.2011 16:32:26 +0300, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
> Attached patch (patch-if_ether.c) fixes the issue.
It seems the attached file has disappeared.
I'll try again...
--
Alexander Zagrebin
--- sys/netinet/if_ether.c.orig 2011-01-16 21:01:41.0 +0300
+++ sys/netinet/if_ether.c 2
Hi!
I've found some issues with the if_bridge on 8.2-PRERELEASE.
1. An ARP issue
Suppose we have a box with the 4 interfaces: nic0, nic1, nic2, nic3.
The interfaces are linked pairwise using 2 bridge(4) interfaces: bridge0
and bridge1. Only nic0 has an IP address assigned (for example,
192.168.0
