On Thursday, January 13, 2011 04:44:03 Kyungsoo Lee wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have used Proxim 8470 LAN cards. But I realized that this card is too old
> to use TDMA on FreeBSD. I need new wireless LAN cards which are supported
> by TDMA on FreeBSD and with an external port to connect directional
I've encountered this before.
The mbuf's there aren't always aligned at this point.
Adrian
On 13 January 2011 14:17, Jayachandran C. wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Find out what the address is that's causing the problem. There's
>> plenty of places where un
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Find out what the address is that's causing the problem. There's
> plenty of places where unaligned mbuf's exist in the IP code and
> aren't correctly realigned before being touched.
>
> MIPS people - is "address error" an alignment problem?
Find out what the address is that's causing the problem. There's
plenty of places where unaligned mbuf's exist in the IP code and
aren't correctly realigned before being touched.
MIPS people - is "address error" an alignment problem?
Adrian
On 30 December 2010 21:47, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
The problem that Robin saw was due to having MSIX interrupts disabled on the
system, I doubt that
is going to be the "issue" for others.
Get the latest version of the igb code and see if that helps you as a first
step.
Jack
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Charles Owens
wrote:
> I'd like to re
Hello guys,
I have used Proxim 8470 LAN cards. But I realized that this card is too old
to use TDMA on FreeBSD. I need new wireless LAN cards which are supported by
TDMA on FreeBSD and with an external port to connect directional antenna. Do
you recommend any cards? Actually, it is hard to find wi
I'd like to report that we're running into this issue also, in our case
on systems that are based on the Intel S5520UR Server Board, running
8.1-RELEASE. If the ichwd driver is loaded we see the same messages,
and network communication via the igb nics is non-functional.
Have you had any luck
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:08PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:20:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Freebsd-net.
> >
> > Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
> > with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who hel
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:59:58PM -0800, Artem Belevich wrote:
> 2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov :
> > Hello, Freebsd-net.
> >
> > ?Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
> > with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who helps me
> > diagnose problem!
> >
> > ?I'
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:20:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
> with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who helps me
> diagnose problem!
>
> I've prepared patch, which adds tunable/s
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov :
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
> with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who helps me
> diagnose problem!
>
> I've prepared patch, which adds tunable/sysctl for rgephy(4) which
> allows not to
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:Juergen Lock
>Organization: me? organized??
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic
>Severity:
>Priority:
>Category: kern
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: FreeBSD 8.1-RC2 am
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:56:19PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Pyun.
> You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 20:32:42:
>
>
> >> > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex
> >> > media option in your manual configuration.
> >> What do you mean by this? Without this media
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 20:32:42:
>> > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex
>> > media option in your manual configuration.
>> What do you mean by this? Without this media options it will be
>> 100Mbit half-duplex when switch port want 100Mbit full-
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:36:09AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:47:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >>
> >> media: Ethernet 100baseTX (100baseTX )
> >
> >I can see what's going on here. Link partner used forced media
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:03:03PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Pyun.
> You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 1:45:26:
>
>
> > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex
> > media option in your manual configuration.
> What do you mean by this? Without this media options it
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who helps me
diagnose problem!
I've prepared patch, which adds tunable/sysctl for rgephy(4) which
allows not to sue autonegotiation by this PHY (at use
Hi,
I am thinking about writing a wireless driver that simulates a wifi
device (a very simple one). I am interested in only testing 11s mesh.
After reading man page for NET80211
http://www.unix.com/man-page/freebsd/9/NET80211/
I see that there are only 5 functions in struct ieee80211com that mus
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:47:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
media: Ethernet 100baseTX (100baseTX )
I can see what's going on here. Link partner used forced media
configuration, probably 100baseTX/full-duplex, and re(4)'s
resolved link is 100b
Hello, Sthaug.
You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 12:14:14:
> Manual configuration of FD for 100 Mbps is not in violation of the
> standards. What the standards say (for 100 Mbps) is that *if* you have
> one end configured for autonegotiation *and* the other end is manually
> configured for full duplex,
> > I'm not surprised that it doesn't work with autonegotian if autonegotian
> > is disabled.
> > If Linux does full-duplex without autonegotiation then _they_ do it wrong
> > and Hetzner shouldn't rely on wrong behavour.
> As far as I understand, Linux does full-duplex without
> autonegotiation
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 1:45:26:
> That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex
> media option in your manual configuration.
What do you mean by this? Without this media options it will be
100Mbit half-duplex when switch port want 100Mbit full-duplex. With
Hello, Bernd.
You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 1:03:14:
> I'm not surprised that it doesn't work with autonegotian if autonegotian
> is disabled.
> If Linux does full-duplex without autonegotiation then _they_ do it wrong
> and Hetzner shouldn't rely on wrong behavour.
As far as I understand, Linux
23 matches
Mail list logo
