Re: Supermicro Bladeserver

2011-01-07 Thread TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro
In article Jack Vogel writes: > I am trying to track down a problem being experienced at icir.org using > SuperMicro > bladeservers, the SERDES 82575 interfaces are having connectivity or perhaps > autoneg problems, resulting in link transitions and watchdog resets. > > The closest hardware my

RE: tcp implementation source code

2011-01-07 Thread Ricky Charlet
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/8.1/sys/netinet/ --- Ricky Charlet > -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Doug Barton > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:09 PM > To: Ivan Voras > Cc: freebsd-net@freeb

Re: NDP Ethernet address display

2011-01-07 Thread Boris Kochergin
On 01/07/11 21:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 01/07/2011 18:01, Boris Kochergin wrote: - snprintf(hbuf, sizeof(hbuf), "%x:%x:%x:%x:%x:%x", There are numerous examples of this string in the tree. Some of them seem like they may be correct, but many of them are obviously printing out mac addresses

Re: NDP Ethernet address display

2011-01-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/07/2011 18:01, Boris Kochergin wrote: - snprintf(hbuf, sizeof(hbuf), "%x:%x:%x:%x:%x:%x", There are numerous examples of this string in the tree. Some of them seem like they may be correct, but many of them are obviously printing out mac addresses and should be converted, one way or an

Re: NDP Ethernet address display

2011-01-07 Thread Boris Kochergin
On 01/07/11 20:26, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 8 January 2011 03:26, Boris Kochergin wrote: Hi. I noticed that ndp(8) doesn't zero-pad Ethernet addresses, which is inconsistent with arp(8): # ndp -an ... 2001:470:897b::1 0:30:48:b1:1b:9c em0 permanent R # arp -an ... ?

Re: NDP Ethernet address display

2011-01-07 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 8 January 2011 03:26, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Hi. I noticed that ndp(8) doesn't zero-pad Ethernet addresses, which is > inconsistent with arp(8): > > # ndp -an > ... > 2001:470:897b::1                     0:30:48:b1:1b:9c     em0 permanent R > > # arp -an > ... > ? (128.238.9.201) at 00:30:48:

Re: NDP Ethernet address display

2011-01-07 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Boris Kochergin wrote: > As everything else I can think of zero-pads them, this makes it a little > annoying to grep for addresses, etc. Is this intentional? It is the case in > 7.x through CURRENT and the fix is quite simple: +1. MAC addresses should be displayed as

NDP Ethernet address display

2011-01-07 Thread Boris Kochergin
Hi. I noticed that ndp(8) doesn't zero-pad Ethernet addresses, which is inconsistent with arp(8): # ndp -an ... 2001:470:897b::1 0:30:48:b1:1b:9c em0 permanent R # arp -an ... ? (128.238.9.201) at 00:30:48:b1:1b:9c on em0 permanent [ethernet] As everything else I can th

Re: tcp implementation source code

2011-01-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/07/2011 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote: On 01/04/11 15:56, J. Hellenthal wrote: On 01/04/2011 04:46, Mickey Harvey wrote: I would like to know where I can find the source code for the TCP implementation so I can do some hacking on it. Have you looked through the repository at all ? http://svn

Re: tcp implementation source code

2011-01-07 Thread Ivan Voras
On 8 January 2011 00:08, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/07/2011 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> On 01/04/11 15:56, J. Hellenthal wrote: >>> >>> On 01/04/2011 04:46, Mickey Harvey wrote: I would like to know where I can find the source code for the TCP implementation so I can do some hack

Re: Check in small patches for ixgbe?

2011-01-07 Thread Jack Vogel
Done, thanks for prodding me Andrew :) Jack On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Boyer wrote: > Would someone please check in the patches I submitted under these PRs? > > kern/150247: [patch] [ixgbe] Version in -current won't build on 7.x systems > kern/153772: [ixgbe] [patch] sysctls refere

Re: tcp implementation source code

2011-01-07 Thread Ivan Voras
On 01/04/11 15:56, J. Hellenthal wrote: On 01/04/2011 04:46, Mickey Harvey wrote: I would like to know where I can find the source code for the TCP implementation so I can do some hacking on it. Have you looked through the repository at all ? http://svn.freebsd.org/ Specifically, http://svn

Re: kern/153772: [ixgbe] [patch] sysctls reference wrong XON/XOFF variables

2011-01-07 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [ixgbe] [patch] sysctls reference wrong XON/XOFF variables Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jan 7 21:55:46 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg

Check in small patches for ixgbe?

2011-01-07 Thread Andrew Boyer
Would someone please check in the patches I submitted under these PRs? kern/150247: [patch] [ixgbe] Version in -current won't build on 7.x systems kern/153772: [ixgbe] [patch] sysctls reference wrong XON/XOFF variables It should only take a minute and I think they're noncontroversial... Thank yo

Re: kern/150247: [patch] [ixgbe] Version in -current won't build on 7.x systems

2011-01-07 Thread Andrew Boyer
The following reply was made to PR kern/150247; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Boyer To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, Andrew Boyer Cc: Subject: Re: kern/150247: [patch] [ixgbe] Version in -current won't build on 7.x systems Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:36:15 -0500 The problem has spread

Supermicro Bladeserver

2011-01-07 Thread Jack Vogel
I am trying to track down a problem being experienced at icir.org using SuperMicro bladeservers, the SERDES 82575 interfaces are having connectivity or perhaps autoneg problems, resulting in link transitions and watchdog resets. The closest hardware my org at Intel has is a Fujitsu server who's bl

Re: [Panic] Dummynet/IPFW related recurring crash.

2011-01-07 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pawel Tyll wrote: > One more question tough, > > I have 4 identical machines, also with em-driven NICs - yet this is > the only one that dies like this. OTOH Other machines don't do traffic > shaping and do not use ipfw that extensively. Does this match your > theo

Re: [Panic] Dummynet/IPFW related recurring crash.

2011-01-07 Thread Pawel Tyll
One more question tough, I have 4 identical machines, also with em-driven NICs - yet this is the only one that dies like this. OTOH Other machines don't do traffic shaping and do not use ipfw that extensively. Does this match your theory? ___ freebsd-n

net80211 11n fixes: Begin handling 11n channel status flags

2011-01-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi all, Here's the first 11n related patch to push into -HEAD. This adds handling 11na/11ng HT/20 channel flags when scanning for access points. Without this patch, 11na/11ng APs aren't considered for association. I'd like to push this into -HEAD and a modified version of it into -8. With this,

Re: [Panic] Dummynet/IPFW related recurring crash.

2011-01-07 Thread Pawel Tyll
Hi Brandon, > Might this be an issue with the em(4) driver? It may be that it's fixed: > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=216440 Thanks Brandon - I'll update to fresh stable and get back to you... in three to four weeks :)