Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/2/2011 4:20 PM, Gabor Radnai wrote: > "The question has come up several times. What should be changed in > re(4) to cover this?" Both the em and re drivers have had a lot of work done recently. Are you trying with 8.2RC1 ? ---Mike ___ free

Problem with re0

2011-01-02 Thread Gabor Radnai
"The question has come up several times. What should be changed in re(4) to cover this?" Well, if this question has come up several times a) it has a reason: same chip works for some but not for others b) description is not clear that driver is only supporting this chip if and when ... Anyhow, on

kame NAT PT implementation

2011-01-02 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hi. I wonder why kame NAT PT implementation has never been imported to the tree? I've tried to move my home box from dual stacked (private IPv4 and IPv6 addresses) to IPv6 only. (My router is dual stacket of course.) totd+faithd works but they can't completely satisfy me. I want to have compl