Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM

2010-12-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 12/24/2010 5:44 PM, Jan Koum wrote: > hi Ivan and Mike, > > wanted to follow up and see if you found a solid long-term solution to this > bug. we are still seeing this problem in our 8.2 environment with ASPM > already disabled. here is what we have: Hmmm, With the latest version of t

Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM

2010-12-24 Thread Ivan Voras
On 24 December 2010 23:44, Jan Koum wrote: > > hi Ivan and Mike, > wanted to follow up and see if you found a solid long-term solution to this > bug. we are still seeing this problem in our 8.2 environment with ASPM > already disabled.  here is what we have: Hi, The patches Jack made when this d

Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM

2010-12-24 Thread Jan Koum
hi Ivan and Mike, wanted to follow up and see if you found a solid long-term solution to this bug. we are still seeing this problem in our 8.2 environment with ASPM already disabled. here is what we have: 1. motherboard is SuperMicro X8SIE-LN4F Intel Xeon: e...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0

Re: lagg/lacp poor traffic distribution

2010-12-24 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 24.12.2010 21:41, Shtorm wrote: > Sorry, I have no idea how to create nice diff, maybe point to small > howto will help :) Copy original file as "file.c.orig" and put your changes to "file.c" then do "diff -u file.c.orig file.c > file.c.diff" then repost file.c.diff contents.

Re: lagg/lacp poor traffic distribution

2010-12-24 Thread Shtorm
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 16:39 +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 20.12.2010 17:21, Shtorm wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 00:35 +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I've loaded router using two lagg interfaces in LACP mode. > >> lagg0 has IP address and two ports (em0 and em1) and carry