Jack Vogel wrote:
> There are pros and cons either way you do things. I was talking
> to some of our Linux crew, they recently changed things so it
> would shut down the phy, but that doesn't always make everyone
> happy either.
In particular, depending on the type of switch and how it is
config
Hi,
Ok. This looks somewhat straight-forward to diagnose and debug.
I don't however have any devices to reproduce this with.
Would someone please describe -exactly- what device(s) I need to try
and acquire to reproduce this behaviour?
Or if you have it happening for you, would you please do a tc
Synopsis: [ieee80211] net80211 discards power-save queue packets early
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->adrian
Responsible-Changed-By: adrian
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Dec 4 00:31:29 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take care of this; I've been knee-deep in this code for someti
Hi Jack,
Thanks for the response.
On 12/03/2010 04:05 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Since you're already configuring the system into a special non-standard
> way you are playing the admin, so I'd expect you to also configure memory
> pool resources, not to have the driver do so. Its also going to depen
Since you're already configuring the system into a special non-standard
way you are playing the admin, so I'd expect you to also configure memory
pool resources, not to have the driver do so. Its also going to depend on
the number of queues you have, you can reduce those manually as well.
I'm glad
There are pros and cons either way you do things. I was talking to some of
our
Linux crew, they recently changed things so it would shut down the phy, but
that
doesn't always make everyone happy either.
Just saying that my FreeBSD drivers have not done so forever :)
Jack
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at
On 04.12.2010 01:37, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> Now I see, thanks.
>>
>> Is it technically possible to bring link down
>> for distinct port of dual-port em/igb-supported NICs using software?
>>
>> If yes, I'd like to patch my source tree.
>> For EtherChannel this kind of management should be possible.
On 12/3/2010 1:44 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 03.12.2010 23:49, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> It has never been the case that 'down'ing an interface brings link down,
>> not on em
>> or igb. So this isn't problem with the release.
>>
>> Jack
>
> Now I see, thanks.
>
> Is it technically possible to bri
Hi,
So I have been playing around with some new hosts I have been deploying
(Dell R710's).
The systems have a single dual port card in them:
i...@pci0:5:0:0:class=0x02 card=0xa04c8086 chip=0x10c98086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
class = network
On 03.12.2010 23:49, Jack Vogel wrote:
> It has never been the case that 'down'ing an interface brings link down,
> not on em
> or igb. So this isn't problem with the release.
>
> Jack
Now I see, thanks.
Is it technically possible to bring link down
for distinct port of dual-port em/igb-supporte
It has never been the case that 'down'ing an interface brings link down, not
on em
or igb. So this isn't problem with the release.
Jack
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 02.12.2010 12:18, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm building new router using 8.2-PREREL
Hi.
On 03.12.2010 01:58, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
FreeBSD A >==ipsec over gre===> FreeBSD B
I'm using FreeBSD as a security gateway:
What it means is that a packet with either an invalid sequence, a
sequence lower than the last seen and outside the window, or a
sequence seen already (lately
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:56:42PM +0100, Gabor Radnai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone pls advise how to inject HEAD driver to stable release without
> > full kernel rebuild (if possible)?
> >
>
> If you have updated to stable/8
13 matches
Mail list logo
