Hi,
Just pinging again. I would really like to get these cards working. If there
is anything I can help with... testing etc...
In the meantime I have upgraded to the latest 8-stable, but the problems
are still there.
Thanks
John
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:39:47AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> OK,
For 11n?
adrian
On 15 September 2010 12:46, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>>> That would be interesting to look at. Is the code somewhere publicly
>>> available? Is it slated to hit the tree soon?
>>
>> There's a git repo somewhere on the net; can't remember where. This
>> information should be in t
>> That would be interesting to look at. Is the code somewhere publicly
>> available? Is it slated to hit the tree soon?
>
> There's a git repo somewhere on the net; can't remember where. This
> information should be in the FreeBSD forums. The driver is for the rt2860.
>
Here it is
http://repo.o
Hi John,
I'm working on bringing over the changes from Linux ath9k into our
HAL. I'm slowly starting on bringing over simple bits and pieces but I
hope to eventually be able to bring over large chunks of the hardware
fiddling almost untouched. Since the current open Atheros development
by people w
On 9/13/10 11:31 PM, Dave Seddon wrote:
Greetings,
Thanks for the quick response.
It sounds like dedicating some space for this in the mbuf would be the
best way forward, but the question is how much. I'm worried that most
freebsd users won't go for lots of route tables, which is why you went
On 14.09.2010 18:08, Fabien Thomas wrote:
On 14 sept. 2010, at 17:41, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 14.09.2010 11:18, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Great,
This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs linux"
To have the best of both world what about a socket option to enable/dis
On 14 sept. 2010, at 17:41, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 14.09.2010 11:18, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>> Great,
>>
>> This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs
>> linux"
>> To have the best of both world what about a socket option to enable/disable
>> fusing:
>> can be u
On 14.09.2010 12:35, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:12:03PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Fabien Thomas wrote:
Great,
This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs
linux"
To have the best of both world what about a socket option to
enable/disabl
On 14.09.2010 12:12, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Fabien Thomas wrote:
Great,
This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs
linux"
To have the best of both world what about a socket option to
enable/disable fusing:
can be useful when you need to see some connection "packetized
On 14.09.2010 11:18, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Great,
This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs linux"
To have the best of both world what about a socket option to enable/disable
fusing:
can be useful when you need to see some connection "packetized".
A sysctl to that
Fabien Thomas wrote:
> Great,
>
> This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs
> linux"
> To have the best of both world what about a socket option to
> enable/disable fusing:
> can be useful when you need to see some connection "packetized".
To chime in, I had a "slow"
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:12:03PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Fabien Thomas wrote:
> > Great,
> >
> > This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs
> > linux"
> > To have the best of both world what about a socket option to
> > enable/disable fusing:
> > can b
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:31:39PM +1000, Dave Seddon wrote:
> It sounds like dedicating some space for this in the mbuf would be the
> best way forward, but the question is how much. I'm worried that most
> freebsd users won't go for lots of route tables, which is why you went
> for 4 bits origin
Hi everyone,
I've just pushed the initial support for the AR9100 wireless MAC into
my git repository. This is for the WMAC on the AR9132 SoC.
I've tested it in 11bg hostap mode on an AP83 derived box - the
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND. The source tree has support for the CPU, ethernet
(but not the switch
Great,
This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs linux"
To have the best of both world what about a socket option to enable/disable
fusing:
can be useful when you need to see some connection "packetized".
Fabien
On 13 sept. 2010, at 13:33, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
Greetings,
Thanks for the quick response.
It sounds like dedicating some space for this in the mbuf would be the
best way forward, but the question is how much. I'm worried that most
freebsd users won't go for lots of route tables, which is why you went
for 4 bits originally.
Within the network
16 matches
Mail list logo
