Re: 8.1-RELEASE em watchdog timeout broken?

2010-08-03 Thread Scott Johnson
> "whenever my desktop PC" > > Now this is where u FAIL. Use dubuntu or windows7 on desktop not FBSD > and don't try again. > > Jax Perhaps I wasn't clear. The desktop PC (which runs WinXP) is connected directly to the em0 port on my FreeBSD server. No Ethernet switch in-between. I connect it

Re: 8.1-RELEASE em watchdog timeout broken?

2010-08-03 Thread Jack Vogel
The watchdog is working in all the internal testing that we've done, if there's some corner case here then I need more info to reproduce it. I'm confused about what's what, which machine is your desktop and what is the 'other' system? For instance, we had a loud complaint about the watchdog here a

Re: 8.1-RELEASE em watchdog timeout broken?

2010-08-03 Thread Jax
"whenever my desktop PC" Now this is where u FAIL. Use dubuntu or windows7 on desktop not FBSD and don't try again. Jax On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Scott Johnson wrote: > Under 8.0-RELEASE I would get warnings from em(4) in /var/log/messages about > > "watchdog timeouts" on em0 whenever m

8.1-RELEASE em watchdog timeout broken?

2010-08-03 Thread Scott Johnson
Under 8.0-RELEASE I would get warnings from em(4) in /var/log/messages about "watchdog timeouts" on em0 whenever my desktop PC connected to em0 was powered off. This was fine, except for the annoying warnings. Under 8.1-RELEASE I no longer get the warnings, and any time my desktop is powered o

Re: CARP over LAGG

2010-08-03 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hello, This should be possible. I do have 7.2 systems which have lagg0 on em0/em1 VLANs over lagg0 and carp over those VLANs. So I guess carp over lagg0 should no be a problem. lagg0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=19b ether 00:30:48:c8:2f:50 media: Ethernet autos

Re: vlan(4) interfaces have wrong interface type in sockaddr_dl address

2010-08-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:17:27PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:29:11 am John Baldwin wrote: > > Currently vlan(4) interfaces have an interface type of IFT_ETHER instead of > > IFT_L2VLAN in the sockaddr_dl that is returned by getifaddrs(3). If you do > > a > > ro

Re: vlan(4) interfaces have wrong interface type in sockaddr_dl address

2010-08-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:29:11 am John Baldwin wrote: > Currently vlan(4) interfaces have an interface type of IFT_ETHER instead of > IFT_L2VLAN in the sockaddr_dl that is returned by getifaddrs(3). If you do a > route lookup for a route that goes across a vlan then the sockaddr_dl > gene

CARP over LAGG

2010-08-03 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. On a couple of 7.2 systems, I've got some carp interfaces build upon a physical interface (em0 or igb0) and everything works fine. On both box I've tried aggregating two interfaces (resp. em0+em1 and igb0+igb1) into a lagg0 interface, using LACP. However, in this case CARP will stop wo

vlan(4) interfaces have wrong interface type in sockaddr_dl address

2010-08-03 Thread John Baldwin
Currently vlan(4) interfaces have an interface type of IFT_ETHER instead of IFT_L2VLAN in the sockaddr_dl that is returned by getifaddrs(3). If you do a route lookup for a route that goes across a vlan then the sockaddr_dl generated for the routing message will specify IFT_L2VLAN (you can see i

freebsd-net@freebsd.org

2010-08-03 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi all, (apologies for any duplicates you receive and please trim the CC list appropriately if you reply to this email) We're pleased to announce the release of a substantial set of new and updated BSD licenced software for TCP experimentation and research using FreeBSD: - "CAIA-Hamilton Delay"