>>
>> There are several major bugs in this patch. I'm planning to make updated
>> patch in several weeks.
>> At the moment it's a very bad idea to use current version in production
>>>
I noticed :) I have many kernel panic's on heavy load (300+300Mbit on
GE channel) in function GetAsNumber. Can't
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 18:56, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> 2010/6/24 Rafael Henrique Faria :
>> Just to be more clean:
>>
>> My pf.conf:
>>
>> wan_if="bce0"
>>
>> set limit { states 10, frags 2 }
>> set loginterface $wan_if
>> set optimization normal
>> set block-policy drop
>> set fingerprin
2010/6/24 Rafael Henrique Faria :
> Just to be more clean:
>
> My pf.conf:
>
> wan_if="bce0"
>
> set limit { states 10, frags 2 }
> set loginterface $wan_if
> set optimization normal
> set block-policy drop
> set fingerprints "/etc/pf.os"
> set skip on lo
>
> altq on $wan_if cbq bandwi
Hi,
On 2010/06/24 21:42, Rafael Henrique Faria wrote:
So, my question is: why the default queue is being used, If I have a
rule to use the out_bal queue to all outgoing traffic on that
interface?
I need to redirect all the traffic from a subnet (/24) to one queue
(incoming and outgoing traffic)
Just to be more clean:
My pf.conf:
wan_if="bce0"
set limit { states 10, frags 2 }
set loginterface $wan_if
set optimization normal
set block-policy drop
set fingerprints "/etc/pf.os"
set skip on lo
altq on $wan_if cbq bandwidth 100% queue { out_bal, out_std }
queue out_bal bandwi
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 14:04, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Rafael Henrique Faria
> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm working on a Brige between a router Cisco 7200, and a 3Com 7900 switch.
>> I have several subnetworks, and I need to balance the bandwidth between then.
>>
>> The Br
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Rafael Henrique Faria
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm working on a Brige between a router Cisco 7200, and a 3Com 7900 switch.
> I have several subnetworks, and I need to balance the bandwidth between then.
>
> The Brigde is running: "FreeBSD dell05 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
> 8.
>
> There are several major bugs in this patch. I'm planning to make updated
> patch in several weeks.
> At the moment it's a very bad idea to use current version in production
>>
I would be willing to test the new patch, I could use it.
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
http://www.fourmannetworks
On Jun 24, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:43:36AM -0700, Randall Stewart wrote:
Lugi:
One other comment I want to make about your numbers... well maybe
three ;-)
...
Randall,
my numbers may well be affected by large errors, but the point was
just to show tha
The following reply was made to PR kern/127057; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sa...@system.pl
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/127057: [udp] Unable to send UDP packet via IPv6 socket
to IPv4 mapped address
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:54:02 +0400
The following reply was made to PR kern/127057; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sa...@system.pl
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/127057: [udp] Unable to send UDP packet via IPv6 socket
to IPv4 mapped address
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:44:25 +0400
Sam Leffler wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Stef Walter wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
I, too, recall the days when you had multiple rate-control algorithms to
choose from, but that doesn't appear to be the case anymore. As a
workaround, I wrote a little script that checks if tha
Hi.
I'm working on a Brige between a router Cisco 7200, and a 3Com 7900 switch.
I have several subnetworks, and I need to balance the bandwidth between then.
The Brigde is running: "FreeBSD dell05 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
8.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Jun 22 13:59:17 BRT 2010
rafaelhfa...@dell05:/usr/obj/
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:43:36AM -0700, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Lugi:
>
> One other comment I want to make about your numbers... well maybe
> three ;-)
...
Randall,
my numbers may well be affected by large errors, but the point was
just to show that the *16/32/64 functions are already widely
On Jun 24, 2010, at 5:29 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:19:29AM -0700, Randall Stewart wrote:
Bob:
Thats strange... when I do
man byteorder
(on my FreeBSD 8.0 system upgraded to head .. buildworld/
installworld/
et.al)
I get the same man age showing for both
man nto
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:19:29AM -0700, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Bob:
>
> Thats strange... when I do
>
> man byteorder
>
> (on my FreeBSD 8.0 system upgraded to head .. buildworld/installworld/
> et.al)
>
> I get the same man age showing for both
>
> man ntohl
>
> and
>
> man byteorder
B
Lugi:
One other comment I want to make about your numbers... well maybe
three ;-)
On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:50:26AM -0700, Randall Stewart wrote:
...
strong objection!
We should instead use names with exact sizes (16,32,64).
So please tel
Дмитрий Замураев wrote:
If you can, add information abount AS numbers too.
ASN patch for 16-bit ASN's for V5 protocol:
http://www.stasyan.com/devel/ng_netflow/patch_asnum_1
Proto V5 can't handle 32-bit ASN unlike V9.
But I can't understand why it's not working for me,
AS numbers exists for first
Bob:
Thats strange... when I do
man byteorder
(on my FreeBSD 8.0 system upgraded to head .. buildworld/installworld/
et.al)
I get the same man age showing for both
man ntohl
and
man byteorder
This may just be a problem with my system.. I will check the other
8.0 installed systems at wor
19 matches
Mail list logo
