Re: Dual-rate transceivers with ixgbe?

2010-06-09 Thread Juli Mallett
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:56, Alexander Sack wrote: > $ ifconfig ix1 > ix1: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 You need to bring the interface up in order for the SFP configuration to occur. > # ifconfig ix1 down > # ifconfig ix1 up > # ifconfig ix1 > ix1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500

Re: Dual-rate transceivers with ixgbe?

2010-06-09 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Juli Mallett wrote: >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:26, Jack Vogel wrote: >>> Hmmm, this is odd, I'm sure that was tested by my validation engineer. >>> Tell me what the hardware looks like, ie what the 1G li

Re: Dual-rate transceivers with ixgbe?

2010-06-09 Thread Alexander Sack
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Juli Mallett wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:26, Jack Vogel wrote: >> Hmmm, this is odd, I'm sure that was tested by my validation engineer. >> Tell me what the hardware looks like, ie what the 1G link partner is >> and I'll have him check into it... it SHOULD

Re: arp(8) performance w/ many aliases assigned to an interface

2010-06-09 Thread Nick Rogers
FYI there is a bugfix/patch for this issue being discussed in freebsd-hackers: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org/msg157097.html ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubs

VLANs, routing, multicast and HP switches, oh my...

2010-06-09 Thread Kurt Buff
All, I have in place a router that I built with FreeBSD (currently it's an i386 build - 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #1: Mon Jul 28 18:59:13 PDT 2008) on a whitebox with 3 dual-port NICs. the relevant data from /etc/rc.conf: defaultrouter="192.168.27.1" gateway_enable="YES" hostn

Re: [RFC] BPF timestamping

2010-06-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 03:42 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 09 June 2010 03:16 pm, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > bpf(4) can only timestamp packets with microtime(9). I want to > > > expand it to be able to use different form

Re: [RFC] BPF timestamping

2010-06-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 03:16 pm, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > bpf(4) can only timestamp packets with microtime(9). I want to > > expand it to be able to use different format and resolution. The > > patch is here: > > > > http://peopl

Re: [RFC] BPF timestamping

2010-06-09 Thread Guy Helmer
On Jun 9, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > bpf(4) can only timestamp packets with microtime(9). I want to expand > it to be able to use different format and resolution. The patch is > here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bpf_tstamp.diff > > With this patch, we can select different

Re: [RFC] BPF timestamping

2010-06-09 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > bpf(4) can only timestamp packets with microtime(9). I want to expand > it to be able to use different format and resolution. The patch is > here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bpf_tstamp.diff > > With this patch, we can sel

[RFC] BPF timestamping

2010-06-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
bpf(4) can only timestamp packets with microtime(9). I want to expand it to be able to use different format and resolution. The patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bpf_tstamp.diff With this patch, we can select different format and resolution of the timestamps. It is done via ioc

Re: kern/147638: [PATCH] [ath] Atheros R9280 has probrem at 8.1-PRERELEASE

2010-06-09 Thread rpaulo
Synopsis: [PATCH] [ath] Atheros R9280 has probrem at 8.1-PRERELEASE Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->rpaulo Responsible-Changed-By: rpaulo Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 9 13:22:23 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Actually, I think the AR_SREV_MERLIN_20() check should just go away.

Re: kern/147638: [PATCH] [ath] Atheros R9280 has probrem at 8.1-PRERELEASE

2010-06-09 Thread Vincent Hoffman
The following reply was made to PR kern/147638; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vincent Hoffman To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, am...@tomato.sakura.ne.jp Cc: Subject: Re: kern/147638: [PATCH] [ath] Atheros R9280 has probrem at 8.1-PRERELEASE Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:00:50 +0100 This is a mu

Re: kern/147155: [ip6] setfb not work with ipv6

2010-06-09 Thread wxs
Synopsis: [ip6] setfb not work with ipv6 Responsible-Changed-From-To: wxs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: wxs Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 9 12:47:35 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Did not mean to grab this one. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147155 _

Re: kern/147155: [ip6] setfb not work with ipv6

2010-06-09 Thread wxs
Synopsis: [ip6] setfb not work with ipv6 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->wxs Responsible-Changed-By: wxs Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 9 12:44:40 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147155 __

Re: kern/146517: [ath] [wlan] device timeouts for ath wlan device on recent stable.

2010-06-09 Thread Vincent Hoffman
The following reply was made to PR kern/146517; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vincent Hoffman To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, vi...@unsane.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: kern/146517: [ath] [wlan] device timeouts for ath wlan device on recent stable. Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:24:18 +0100 I've appli