On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:51:00PM +0500, Perevalov Sergey wrote:
> On 02.06.2010 03:24, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:31:13PM +0500, Perevalov Sergey wrote:
> >
> >>Hi!
> >>I tried it with crossover cable but results was the same bad. Then set
> >>debug flag hw.usb.axe.deb
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:24:38PM +0200, Krzysztof Dajka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to enable jumbo frames on my re0 NIC. I tried:
> # ifconfig re0 mtu 1600
> ifconfig: ioctl (set mtu): Invalid argument
>
> I have found in /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c
> /*
> * These controllers support jumbo fr
On Jun 3, 2010, at 04:45 , Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
>> A while back another src developer mentioned that he had gotten better
>> performance by changing
>> tcpip_fillheaders() in the following way:
>
> It's unlikely to make any significant or even
On 02.06.2010 03:24, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:31:13PM +0500, Perevalov Sergey wrote:
Hi!
I tried it with crossover cable but results was the same bad. Then set
debug flag hw.usb.axe.debug: to 15, and started ping -f from ue0.
And in /var/log/messages I found these str
Hi,
I'm trying to enable jumbo frames on my re0 NIC. I tried:
# ifconfig re0 mtu 1600
ifconfig: ioctl (set mtu): Invalid argument
I have found in /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c
/*
* These controllers support jumbo frame but it seems
* that enabling it requires touching additional magic
* registers.
Hi,
I had a question on how the current tcp_input()/tcp_do_segment() code
handles ACKs on out-of-window packets.
Specifically, The code to handle packets which fall entirely to the left
of the window.
Here is the scenario I am analyzing right now.
1. Client has sent out a window
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, George Neville-Neil wrote:
A while back another src developer mentioned that he had gotten better
performance by changing
tcpip_fillheaders() in the following way:
It's unlikely to make any significant or even measurable difference,
but... I got apparent large (up to 20%)
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/147191; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Jose M Rodriguez
> To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: kern/147191: [ppp] Problems with ppp -nat [pppoe], ipfw,
> dummynet
> Date: Wed, 02 J
