Synopsis: [vlan] IP source address for outgoing connections
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: julian
State-Changed-When: Sat May 8 09:47:30 PDT 2010
State-Changed-Why:
The behaviour you quote as a bug is expected and useful and I don't think it is
a bug.
Any non-bound socke
Old Synopsis: ng_l2tp: a false invaliant check was performed in
ng_l2tp_seq_check()
New Synopsis: [ng_l2tp] a false invaliant check was performed in
ng_l2tp_seq_check()
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat May 8 14:4
Old Synopsis: IP source address for outgoing connections
New Synopsis: [vlan] IP source address for outgoing connections
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat May 8 14:38:10 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to ma
Much of the FreeBSD networking stack has been made parallel in order to
cope with high packet rates at 10 Gig/sec operation.
I've seen good numbers (near 10 Gig) in my tests involving TCP/UDP
send/receive. (latest Intel driver).
As far as BPF is concerned, above statement does not hold true,
si
On 5/7/10, jiani1012 wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am using xp3264-7.7.0.329-whql.zip file from Atheros.
> #cd /sys/modules/ndis
> #make install
> #cd /sys/modules/if_ndis
> #make install
> #ndiscvt -i netathwx.inf -s athwx.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h
> (syn
Looks a little like
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-May/023679.html
but for intel. cool.
Vince
On 07/05/2010 23:01, grarpamp wrote:
> Just wondering in general these days how close FreeBSD is to
> full 10Gb rates at various packet sizes from minimum ethernet
> frame to max jumb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:08, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
In Message-Id: <20100426080815.ga41...@icarus.home.lan>
Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
ei
