Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/30/10 1:23 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to
set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that
parameter is only 50, which is pretty low especially for the cases when
the system hand
On 4/30/10 1:23 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to
set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that
parameter is only 50, which is pretty low especially for the cases when
the system handles lot of small packets
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to
> set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that
> parameter is only 50, which is pretty low especially for the cases when
> the system handles lot of small packets and can cause
How much of rfc 5227 is supported by FreeBSD > 7.0? Any insight into
plans for support?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to
set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that
parameter is only 50, which is pretty low especially for the cases when
the system handles lot of small packets and can cause ENOBUFS in
applications
The following reply was made to PR kern/143939; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Robert Huff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, dima_...@inbox.lv
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/143939: [ipfw] [em] ipfw nat and em interface rxcsum problem
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:55:02 -0400
Thirded. This fixed it on:
Synopsis: [ipsec][patch] NAT traversal does not work in transport mode
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Apr 30 19:13:57 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr
Hi all,
While doing some 10Gb benchmark i've found that m_getjcl does not benefit from
the packet zone.
There is a ~ 80% increase in FPS when applying the following patch.
256B frame driver to driver / stable_8:
- 3 765 066 FPS
- 6 868 153 FPS with the patch applied.
Is there a good rea
The following reply was made to PR kern/144755; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joey Mingrone
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ed...@mavetju.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/144755: [iwi] [panic] iwi panic when issuing /etc/rc.d/netif
restart on 8-STABLE r205159
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:43:22
