Re: kern/144000: [tcp] ignore set TCP_MAXSEG by setsockopt()

2010-03-26 Thread Andrey Zonov
The following reply was made to PR kern/144000; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrey Zonov To: John Baldwin Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/144000: [tcp] ignore set TCP_MAXSEG by setsockopt() Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:59:19 +0300 For 7/8-stable not helped me. John Baldwin

multiple radius servers

2010-03-26 Thread Evgenii Davidov
HELO is it true that there is a bug in libradius so mpd can't work with multiple radius servers configured? thanks -- Evgenii V Davidov ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send

NFS lockd problem

2010-03-26 Thread Giulio Ferro
Outset: 1 NFS server (with lockd) 2 NFS client (with lockd) The clients serve several jails with apache, whose data (www) resides on the server From time to time everything seem to freeze. Then, after one minute or so, the system works again as nothing had happened. In these occasions I get

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Vasily Samoylov
On 26.03.2010 11:01, Hartmut Brandt wrote: VS>I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear enough. For now, VS>from network admin point of view, it's 3 problems: VS>1) No ARP support The ARP table should be there. It may be that it got 'lost' with the ARP changes last year. So this

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Hartmut Brandt
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Vasily Samoylov wrote: VS>On 26.03.2010 9:10, Harti Brandt wrote: VS>> SS>P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is VS>> SS>facing with bsnmp is that it lacks support for LLDP, do I understand VS>> SS>correctly? VS>> VS>> This is what I understood too.

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Vasily Samoylov
On 26.03.2010 9:10, Harti Brandt wrote: SS>P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is SS>facing with bsnmp is that it lacks support for LLDP, do I understand SS>correctly? This is what I understood too. harti I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear e

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Alexander Bubnov
Thanks a lot for your answers. 2010/3/26 Hartmut Brandt > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote: > > AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to > AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of > AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plu

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Hartmut Brandt
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote: AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license. Many years ago I needed a small SN

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi, On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote: AB>One more question please in scope of snmp topic. does bsnmp support master AB>agentx mode? No. I read through the documents and decided that I would not have time to implement this. I often use external agents in projects, but usually use cus

Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD

2010-03-26 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi, On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Shteryana Shopova wrote: SS>On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Harti Brandt wrote: SS>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote: SS>> SS>> SS>> - bsnmp is lacking developers (I'm the only one). I had a surgery in SS>+ 1 (count me in that is) SS>> november and took the 4