Re: Setting HT capabilities in net80211

2010-03-10 Thread Rui Paulo
On 11 Mar 2010, at 16:32, Alexander Egorenkov wrote: There are already constants defined in iee80211.h. E.g. IEEE80211_HTCAP_MCSFBACK_UNSOL. But the problem is that e.g. IEEE80211_HTCAP_MCSFBACK_UNSOL is equal to 0x0200 and the capabilty constant IEEE80211_HTCAP_RXSTBC_2STREAM has the same

Re: Setting HT capabilities in net80211

2010-03-10 Thread Alexander Egorenkov
There are already constants defined in iee80211.h. E.g. IEEE80211_HTCAP_MCSFBACK_UNSOL. But the problem is that e.g. IEEE80211_HTCAP_MCSFBACK_UNSOL is equal to 0x0200 and the capabilty constant IEEE80211_HTCAP_RXSTBC_2STREAM has the same value. So we cannot use ic_htcap field for both capabilities

Re: kern/144476: [ieee80211] Incorrect "SM power save mode" HT capability constants

2010-03-10 Thread rpaulo
Synopsis: [ieee80211] Incorrect "SM power save mode" HT capability constants Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->rpaulo Responsible-Changed-By: rpaulo Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 11 06:58:03 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Grab it http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144476 _

Re: IPFIREWALL_FORWARD

2010-03-10 Thread Julian Elischer
Chris St Denis wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: n j wrote: Hello, although this has probably been asked before, could anyone point me to some relevant information about why fwd/forward requires kernel recompile, i.e. it's not been made a kernel module? This prevents me from using freebsd-update a

Re: IPFIREWALL_FORWARD

2010-03-10 Thread Chris St Denis
Julian Elischer wrote: n j wrote: Hello, although this has probably been asked before, could anyone point me to some relevant information about why fwd/forward requires kernel recompile, i.e. it's not been made a kernel module? This prevents me from using freebsd-update and forces me to upgrade

Re: IPFIREWALL_FORWARD

2010-03-10 Thread Julian Elischer
n j wrote: Hello, although this has probably been asked before, could anyone point me to some relevant information about why fwd/forward requires kernel recompile, i.e. it's not been made a kernel module? This prevents me from using freebsd-update and forces me to upgrade from source which - eve

Re: kern/141646: [em] em(4) + lagg(4) + vlan(4) generatesISL-tagged frames instead of 802.1q-tagged frames

2010-03-10 Thread Steven Hartland
FYI: When we tested lagg to a cisco 6509 balancing didnt work at all, that was with 8.0 release. Initial investigation seemed to indicated a problem with aggregator creation. See the thread: Problems getting lagg to balance using lacp for more info. Regards Steve - Original Message -

Re: Permission denied error

2010-03-10 Thread Miroslav Lachman
serena zanetta wrote: Hi, I’ve got a problem with the packet injection. I’ve tried to send a packet by the means of the nemesis suite. Everything works fine since I type the command “nemesis udp …” on the command line. If I tried to call the same command via the PHP exec() exec("nemesis udp

Permission denied error

2010-03-10 Thread serena zanetta
Hi, I’ve got a problem with the packet injection. I’ve tried to send a packet by the means of the nemesis suite. Everything works fine since I type the command “nemesis udp …” on the command line. If I tried to call the same command via the PHP exec() exec("nemesis udp $message_to_send",$res

Re: kern/144564: lltable grows too much

2010-03-10 Thread Evgenii Davidov
>Please send me a copy of your route table and the arp table privately. sent, thank you! -- Evgenii V Davidov ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-