On Thursday 18 February 2010 06:02 pm, Wesley Shields wrote:
> I'm looking for someone with knowledge of BPF to review this patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/bpf.diff
>
> It's basically a fixed version of the one in kern/143855. Using the
> test program provided I was able to get the callba
Synopsis: [bpf] [patch] non-blocking BPF reads return -1/EWOULDBLOCK until the
store buffer fills up
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->jkim
Responsible-Changed-By: jkim
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 19 22:29:28 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take it.
http://www.freebsd.org/c
Hi, all,
Recalling my old posting "dummynet dropping too many packets" dated
October 4, 2009, the problem isn't over just yet. This time, there are
no interface i/o drops (just a reminder: we have 2 bce(4) GigE cards
connected to a Cisco router, one for input, and one for output. The box
itse
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:43:20PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> This thread is confusing, first he says its an igb problem, then you offer
> an em patch :)
>
> I have an important rev of igb that I am about ready to release, anyone that
> wishes to
> test against a problem they have would be welcome
Max Laier wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:02:55 Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP
and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet
controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The
test setup
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:32:37 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 2/17/2010 3:26 PM, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I have mpd 5.3 running on 8.0-RC1 as PPPoE server (now only 5 clients).
>> Today mpd process hung and I cannot kill it with -9 signal, and I cannot
>> access it's consol
On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:02:55 Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP
> and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet
> controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The
> test setup is simple enou
Jack Vogel wrote:
This thread is confusing, first he says its an igb problem, then you
offer an em patch :)
I suspect it could be patch for the kern/140326.
-Maxim
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
