Qing:
What about the possibility of going to 7.3-RELEASE? There is a lot
that is good about 8.x, but when I build a production system I
prefer to use a release that will have extended support. After all,
it's awkward to build a production server that will need to be
taken down for a major upg
>
> Not since the ARP table and the routing table have been split.
> However, the addresses for which the machine is doing proxy ARP do
> need to show up there, and they do not.
>
You described a bug symptom that should have been fixed.
The proxy ARP entry should be displayed in the ARP table
a
At 02:35 AM 2/3/2010, Li, Qing wrote:
Proxy ARP entries are not installed into the routing table.
Not since the ARP table and the routing table have been split.
However, the addresses for which the machine is doing proxy ARP do
need to show up there, and they do not.
I believe I have fixe
Hello, Jinmei,
> Your understanding of what's happening is correct, and it's an
> intentional behavior. The relevant part of the source code is the
> following snippet of:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c?rev=1.81.2.4;content-type=text/plain
Thanks so much
Hi,
When hostapd triggers rekeying of the group key, wpa_supplicant successfully
sets the correct new key. On first use of the new key tkip_mixing_phase1()
should be applied before decrypting any frames, tkip_decrypt() does this as
if (iv32 != (u32)(key->wk_keyrsc[tid] >> 16) || !ctx->rx_phase1
