Le 31 janv. 2010 à 23:49, Jerry Toung a écrit :
> Hello list,
> my employer is asking me to implement westwood, this is most likely happen
> on 8.0.
>
> before I start, I'd like to know for what reason it hasn't been done in the
> main tree?
> is it that no one has had time, or it only work in a
Hi Jerry,
On 02/01/10 09:49, Jerry Toung wrote:
Hello list,
my employer is asking me to implement westwood, this is most likely happen
on 8.0.
before I start, I'd like to know for what reason it hasn't been done in the
main tree?
is it that no one has had time, or it only work in a lab environm
Can you incorporate its protocol into freebsd kernel? it is currently
applicable to freebsd 4.4. See below.
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/NRL/hpi/tcpw/implementation.html
On 1/02/2010 9:49 AM, Jerry Toung wrote:
Hello list,
my employer is asking me to implement westwood, this is most likely happen
Hello list,
my employer is asking me to implement westwood, this is most likely happen
on 8.0.
before I start, I'd like to know for what reason it hasn't been done in the
main tree?
is it that no one has had time, or it only work in a lab environment? may be
too many changes in the stack
and it's
Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
Why doesn't 802.11 stack assign sequence numbers to A-MPDU frames ?
Because if net80211 does the assignment it may be wrong. As the comment
says, if tx aggregation causes frames to be q'd above the h/w then by
the time they are sent OTA the pre-assigned seq# may be
No, ralink.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> On 27 Jan 2010, at 19:04, Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm implementing a device driver for a 802.11n NIC under FreeBSD 8
>
> Just to make sure we don't step on each others shoes: it's not ath(4),
> right?
>
> --
>
