Re: A-MPDU transmission in net80211 on FreeBSD 8

2010-01-30 Thread Alexander Egorenkov
And i took a look into the 802.11 stack of OpenSolaris which also supports 802.11n. This 802.11n stack is very similar to the FreeBSD 802.11n stack and it assigns sequence numbers to A-MPDU frames. I did it in my device driver like 802.11n stack from OpenSolaris does it. See this link: http://src

Re: A-MPDU transmission in net80211 on FreeBSD 8

2010-01-30 Thread Alexander Egorenkov
Why doesn't 802.11 stack assign sequence numbers to A-MPDU frames ? When sequence numbers are not assigned to A-MPDU frames, then BA doesn't work with my AP. I tried to assign sequence numbers to A-MPDU frames in my device driver and then BAs worked with my AP. And what is meant by aggregation queu

Re: A-MPDU transmission in net80211 on FreeBSD 8

2010-01-30 Thread Sam Leffler
Alexander Egorenkov wrote: Sorry, i posted the wrong comment. Here is the comment which i don't understand: /* * NB: don't assign a sequence # to potential * aggregates; we expect this happens at the * point the frame comes off any aggregation q

Re: NFS mount properties

2010-01-30 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:46:33 -0800 Alan Aldrich wrote: > I am trying to determine how to examine the actual properties of an > nfs mount in FreeBSD > In CentOS one can 'cat /proc/mounts' to determine all of the mount > properties. > Specifically I am trying to confirm whether the mount is using TC

Re: wlan adhoc mode crash

2010-01-30 Thread John Hay
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:40:56PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 12/1/09, John Hay wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure if this is the best list. > > > > I'm trying to get our Avila (arm) boards with atheros wireless cards > > upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0. We use adhoc mode and I get a panic in > > i

Re: kern/141646: [em] em(4) + lagg(4) + vlan(4) generatesISL-tagged frames instead of 802.1q-tagged frames

2010-01-30 Thread Jeff Blank
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:47:31AM -, Steven Hartland wrote: > Since your using lagg there Jeff have you done on perf testing at > all, when I tested here dual em0 + lagg + lacp => cisco 6509 although > all seemed to negotiate correctly, balancing wasn't working at all. Haven't done any perf t

Re: Tunneling in freeBSD

2010-01-30 Thread Bruce Simpson
On 01/30/10 04:11, Nazeem نجم لدين wrote: hi, Can you suggest way of getting a multicast tunnel work. The assumption is that there is a unicast cloud in between two mbone networks. So we need to forward the multicast traffic over the unicast tunnel. Application is for video transmission. J