Enhancement for ns_format_ttl available

2010-01-19 Thread Joseph Turner
Hopefully I'm posting to the right mailing list. I couldn't suss out how one joins up to be able to submit patches to FreeBSD so I'm posting here to point out my submitted patch to the Android code base. Their code is basically lifted straight from FreeBSD so the patch should apply cleanly. In a

Re: 8.0 stable if_bwi kmod not exist?

2010-01-19 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:44:16PM +0800, wsk wrote: > folks, > There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable why? Looks like it wasn't hooked up to the build for some reason, no bwi here: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/8/sys/modules/Makefile?revision=202410&vie

Re: 8.0 stable if_bwi kmod not exist?

2010-01-19 Thread wsk
于 2010/01/20 02:57, Steven Friedrich 写道: On Tuesday 19 January 2010 12:44:16 am wsk wrote: folks, There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable why? ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re: 8.0 stable if_bwi kmod not exist?

2010-01-19 Thread Steven Friedrich
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 12:44:16 am wsk wrote: > folks, >There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable > why? ___ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscrib

Re: kern/137292: [ste] DFE-580TX not working properly

2010-01-19 Thread yongari
Synopsis: [ste] DFE-580TX not working properly State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: yongari State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 19 18:44:44 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: I fixed serveral bugs in ste(4) and the change was already MFCed to stable/8 and stable/7. Would you try latest ste(4)

8.0 stable if_bwi kmod not exist?

2010-01-19 Thread wsk
folks, There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable why? ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: DHCP6 client

2010-01-19 Thread Brett Lee
David Horn wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Brett Lee wrote: Brett Lee wrote: Hello - Am using FreeBSD 6.3 as a dhcp6 client, trying to get DDNSv6 operational in this environment. When I execute 'dhcp6c -d lnc0' from the command line, the following messages are logged on the (ISC 4.1.

Re: Processing IPv6 Router Advertisements

2010-01-19 Thread Fernando Gont
Hello, David, Thanks so much for your response. Comments in-line >> I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-Release in one of my boxes, and there seems to >> be a bug in the processing of Router Advertisement messages. >> >> RA messages seem to be required to have a Source Address in the >> fe80::/32 prefix,

Re: kern/142766: ipw regression ipw(4) with Intel PRO/wireless 2100 can't associate on FBSD 8

2010-01-19 Thread Jens Thiede
The following reply was made to PR kern/142766; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jens Thiede To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, wbl...@wonkity.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/142766: ipw regression ipw(4) with Intel PRO/wireless 2100 can't associate on FBSD 8 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:13:16 +0200 The

Re: Processing IPv6 Router Advertisements

2010-01-19 Thread David Horn
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Fernando Gont wrote: > Hello, folks, > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-Release in one of my boxes, and there seems to > be a bug in the processing of Router Advertisement messages. > > RA messages seem to be required to have a Source Address in the > fe80::/32 prefix, ra

Processing IPv6 Router Advertisements

2010-01-19 Thread Fernando Gont
Hello, folks, I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-Release in one of my boxes, and there seems to be a bug in the processing of Router Advertisement messages. RA messages seem to be required to have a Source Address in the fe80::/32 prefix, rather than in the fe80::/10 prefix. That is, the first 32 bits of th

Re: Unified rc.firewall ipfw me/me6 issue

2010-01-19 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:04:43PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:42:58PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:52:32 +0100 Luigi Rizzo said: While we are at it, might I suggest one more "nice" thing... For several of my projects