Re: What is better? Use a SMP kernel or amd64 for network?

Han Hwei Woo wrote: It used to be that UP i386 was the way to go for best routing performance. I'm not sure if this has changed more recently, due to the changes in the network stack. In all seriousness, try it and let us know. Wes Morgan wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Rafael Ganascim wrote:

Re: What is better? Use a SMP kernel or amd64 for network?

It used to be that UP i386 was the way to go for best routing performance. I'm not sure if this has changed more recently, due to the changes in the network stack. Wes Morgan wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Rafael Ganascim wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> I have a doubt (don't encountered on google) abo

netstat -an shows me an open "phantom" tcp6 port

Hi I'm confused. I've a new installed FreeBSD system. I'm running NFS, http, ntpd and a ftp server. If i look for open ports netstat shows me something on port 1000 (ipv6) netstat -an | grep 1000 tcp6 0 0 *.1000 *.*LISTEN But sockstat shows me n

Re: What is better? Use a SMP kernel or amd64 for network?

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Rafael Ganascim wrote: Hi list, I have a doubt (don't encountered on google) about what is better for a FreeBSD Router: use a 32bits SMP kernel or an amd64? I know that exists some differences, but generaly, what is better and why? I have a hardware with Xeon Dual processo

What is better? Use a SMP kernel or amd64 for network?

Hi list, I have a doubt (don't encountered on google) about what is better for a FreeBSD Router: use a 32bits SMP kernel or an amd64? I know that exists some differences, but generaly, what is better and why? I have a hardware with Xeon Dual processor. Thanks, Rafael __

Wireless PCI recommendations for CURRENT

I'd like suggestions for a PCI wifi. Vanilla tower with -CURRENT. Thanks in advance, Eric ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.or

Getting creation and modification time of an IPv6 interface address

Hi, I'm working on the IpAddressTable for bsnmpd. This table has two rows ipAddressCreated and ipAddressLastUpdated which seem to correspond to the created and changed fields of the struct in6_ifaddr. Because there seems no way (except for poking in the kernel memory) to get at these values I h

Re: [CFR] unified rc.firewall

Hi, > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:55:25 -0500 > John Baldwin said: I updated the patch. jhb> I had missed the me vs any. It is true that the equivalent rule would use jhb> me6. I would rather figure out the IPv6 bug so that TCP is treated the jhb> same for both protocols instead of having

Re: Need help on IPv6 prefixes and interface addresses

wrote in : Ha> To answer my own question :-) These strange link local addresses are Ha> explained in the developers handbook section 8.1.1.3 and are called Ha> embedded Ha> link local addresses. These are not standard IPv6 addresses, but a way Ha> to encode the interface index (aka zone index)

RE: Need help on IPv6 prefixes and interface addresses

To answer my own question :-) These strange link local addresses are explained in the developers handbook section 8.1.1.3 and are called embedded link local addresses. These are not standard IPv6 addresses, but a way to encode the interface index (aka zone index) into the IPv6 address. This must

Need help on IPv6 prefixes and interface addresses

Hi all, I try to make bsnmpd IPv6 aware and need some help here. I've set up a small IPv6 network for testing between a couple of VMs. For IPv6 interface addresses there are two tables: ipAddressPrefix table and ipAddressTable (containing pointers to the prefix table). Now I see something on

possible memory leak in em_dma_free?

Hi all, I saw em driver, and found a possible memory leak. dma->dma_map may be NULL, so the dma memory will not be freed. I think the condition will it be beter if it is "(dma->dma_vaddr != NULL) {" Thanks static void em_dma_free(struct adapter *adapter, struct em_dma_alloc *dma) { if (dma->d