Re: Call for testers: ng_netflow with v9 and IPv6 support

2009-09-06 Thread Julian Elischer
grarpamp wrote: Wouldn't it be better to support the obvious formal emergent standards track protocol instead of the legacy informational one? Or to perform both via sysctl or other arguments/defines, with the standard IPFIX being the default mode? Have you reviewed the nProbe code for other vari

Call for testers: ng_netflow with v9 and IPv6 support

2009-09-06 Thread grarpamp
Wouldn't it be better to support the obvious formal emergent standards track protocol instead of the legacy informational one? Or to perform both via sysctl or other arguments/defines, with the standard IPFIX being the default mode? Have you reviewed the nProbe code for other various ideas? Thanks