On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:41:20PM +0100, Alireza Torabi wrote:
>> folks,
>>
>> Can anyone please shet any lights on this. are iwn & iwnfw going to
>> support 5100 agn wifi?
>> I've updated mine to 8. Current with iwn & iwnfw and still not go
thanks
so i gathered by the lack of response i must say...
On 8/15/09, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:41:20PM +0100, Alireza Torabi wrote:
>> folks,
>>
>> Can anyone please shet any lights on this. are iwn & iwnfw going to
>> support 5100 agn wifi?
>> I've updated mine to 8.
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:41:20PM +0100, Alireza Torabi wrote:
> folks,
>
> Can anyone please shet any lights on this. are iwn & iwnfw going to
> support 5100 agn wifi?
> I've updated mine to 8. Current with iwn & iwnfw and still not going
> anywhere with the card.
AFAIK no one working on it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, guys,
Here is a patch that implements the functionality in userland (as
setifdescription/getifdescription functions in libutil); with this I
think we can also provide an option that some kernel feature (like Qing
Li said it might be useful for emb
Old Synopsis: [patch] Add XMIT_FAILOVER to ng_one2many
New Synopsis: [netgraph] [patch] Add XMIT_FAILOVER to ng_one2many
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 14 20:20:55 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to m
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:49:24AM -0700, Li, Qing wrote:
> >
> > My point has always been - if I have to add/do an ioctl I can always
> > also use a library call that will read it from a .txt, .xml, .db file
> > or whatever and I don't have to go to the kernel, handle all the
> > string length pr
>
> My point has always been - if I have to add/do an ioctl I can always
> also use a library call that will read it from a .txt, .xml, .db file
> or whatever and I don't have to go to the kernel, handle all the
> string length problems there, ... especially as the kernel cannot do
> anything with
On Aug 14, 2009, at 3:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi,
Xin LI wrote:
The only question I have would be, that is it possible to uniquely
identify a NIC without assistance from kernel? For instance, one
can
change an interface from being called
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi,
Xin LI wrote:
The only question I have would be, that is it possible to uniquely
identify a NIC without assistance from kernel? For instance, one can
change an interface from being called "em0" to "eth0" and from "bge0" to
"em0". It's easy to
