Old Synopsis: bge will not resume properly after suspend
New Synopsis: [bge] bge will not resume properly after suspend
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jul 18 04:26:34 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to ma
All:
We recently worked closely with some FreeBSD developers to track down
an illusive bug in the stack.
In a high performance environment, we observed dropped (or extreme
delayed) SYN packets, but were unable to easily reproduce the problem
using test case scenarios.
Our environment:
- Free
Wes Morgan wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/136836; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wes Morgan
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/136836: atheros card stops functioning after about 12 hours
uptime
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:58:33 -0500 (CDT)
These messages s
The following reply was made to PR kern/136836; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wes Morgan
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/136836: atheros card stops functioning after about 12 hours
uptime
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:58:33 -0500 (CDT)
These messages show up in syslog indi
The following reply was made to PR kern/136836; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wes Morgan
To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/136836: atheros card stops functioning after about 12 hours
uptime
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
These messages show up in s
The following reply was made to PR kern/136618; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Artis Caune
To: Eygene Ryabinkin
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/136618: [pf][stf] panic on cloning interface without unit
number, e.g. `stf'
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009
2009/7/10 Eygene Ryabinkin
> No problems. Care to test both patches? If yes, please, report back
> any findings of any type.
>
Hi, patch works good on amd64, 8.0-BETA2, r195712
r...@freebsd ~# ifconfig carp0 name carp
ifconfig: ioctl (set name): File exists
--
Artis Caune
Everyt
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:34:52AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
[...]
> >>>I'd like to ask for the state of that NAT-T support in 7.2. I've
> >>>seen a note in ipsec-tools's OPTIONS for a required kernel patch
> >>>for 6.x in order to have NAT-T working. Is this also requir
