Re: [LOR] carp vs bridge

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > This LOR is observed in an environment with both CARP and bridge set up. >  Is this an known one? > > lock order reversal: > >  1st 0xff00033253e0 carp_if (carp_if) @ > /usr/src/sys/neti

[LOR] carp vs bridge

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This LOR is observed in an environment with both CARP and bridge set up. Is this an known one? lock order reversal: 1st 0xff00033253e0 carp_if (carp_if) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c:1326 2nd 0xff00031d1218 if_bridge (if_bridge) @

test

Hello -- With the best ragards Nasser Rahmati Sepehr S. T. Co. Ltd. Tel: +9821 88975701 Fax: +9821 88983352 E-mail: rahm...@sepehrs.com Web: http://www.sepehrs.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/

Re: kern/135222: [igb] low speed routing between two igb interfaces

The following reply was made to PR kern/135222; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Joshua Reynolds To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, 1...@hnt.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/135222: [igb] low speed routing between two igb interfaces Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:57:20 -0600 --Apple-Mail-35-772384282 Conten

Re: Regression: em driver in -CURRENT, "Invalid MAC address"

Jack Vogel wrote: > In case you hadn't seen it, the code that fixes this is now checked into > the tip, so the latest em driver should work for you. I upgraded the machine in question this morning and it appears to be working, thanks! >>> em0: mem >>> 0xdb00-0xdb01 >>> irq 28 at device

question regarding IPSEC Setup

So I have a couple of questions regarding a scenario that has recently been brought to me. I have two sites, one with a cisco device and one with a server running freebsd 7.2. The client wants to connect the two sites using these devices and I am told that the best way would be to establish an IP

Re: kern/136695: [ip] [patch] fwd reached after skipto in dynamic rules does not work in every case

Old Synopsis: fwd reached after skipto in dynamic rules does not work in every case [PATCH] New Synopsis: [ip] [patch] fwd reached after skipto in dynamic rules does not work in every case Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: Fwd: dump hangs on 7.1

The problem you're referring to was fixed in 7.1 (we had the same issues in 7.0 i386), so I don't think this is the problem Len is facing. Balázs Mátéffy wrote: > Hi, > > I had a similar error with 7.0, and found reference that there was > problem(as far as I can remember there was an issue with

Fwd: dump hangs on 7.1

Hi, I had a similar error with 7.0, and found reference that there was problem(as far as I can remember there was an issue with large disk I/O and creating snapshots on the partition). Dump was creating the files, and it hanged, sometimes it finishes like once in ten for small partitions. Every ti