Hi,
Here is my system:
FreeBSD fw.rufus.net 7.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p1 #1: Wed Jun
10 11:32:28 CDT 2009 r...@hamachi.rufus.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SOEKRIS
i386
I am seeing occasional panics in ip_input when forwarding IP traffic at
low rates (<100pkt/sec).
Fat
On 7/10/09, ** wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My system is atom n270 1G RAM, freebsd 7.2 release .without swap.
> When my ath is associated with an AP, and the traffic is high, the
> system will panic and reboot. this happened many times.
> Can you give me some advice please.
> thanks
>
> Mic
2009/7/10 pluknet :
> Hi.
>
> I have the next string in rc.conf:
> ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 192.168.193.193/32"
>
> /etc/rc.d/netif restart lo0 prints an error:
>
> Stopping network:ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCDIFADDR): Can't assign requested address
> lo0.
> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
> inet6 fe8
Hi.
I have the next string in rc.conf:
ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 192.168.193.193/32"
/etc/rc.d/netif restart lo0 prints an error:
Stopping network:ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCDIFADDR): Can't assign requested address
lo0.
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
Hello,
After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when
connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global
unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated!
My configuration:
[r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 150
Hi all
My system is atom n270 1G RAM, freebsd 7.2 release .without swap.
When my ath is associated with an AP, and the traffic is high, the
system will panic and reboot. this happened many times.
Can you give me some advice please.
thanks
Micheal Kevin
uname -a
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0
kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
15 0xc040 97f830 kernel
21 0xc0d8 ff18 iscsi_initiator.ko
31 0xc0d9 6a2c4acpi.ko
iscontrol doesn't have -V version and strings doesn't find anything that looks
> > I'll change the commented version, as it shouldn't do any harm.
> > As I said, I usually use 14, which is probably almost too low.
> I don't see any real added value having 14 instead of 10. At these levels it
> can be only a "faked" one.
Grand - let's leave it at 10 then.
David.
___
The following reply was made to PR kern/136618; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eygene Ryabinkin
To: Artis Caune
Cc: lini...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
mla...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/136618: [pf][stf] panic on cloning interface without unit
n
Artis, good day.
Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:53:07AM +0300, Artis Caune wrote:
> 2009/7/10 Eygene Ryabinkin :
> > There is kern/127042 (rather old one, but it essentially the same as the
> > current PR) that addresses this aspect of the problem: it
> >
> > - additionally, it refuses to rename interfa
According to David Malone:
> I'll change the commented version, as it shouldn't do any harm.
> As I said, I usually use 14, which is probably almost too low.
I don't see any real added value having 14 instead of 10. At these levels it
can be only a "faked" one.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: Th
11 matches
Mail list logo