Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
I think you are rather confused about what Multiple FIBs is..
All it is is teh ability to make a packet use a particular
FIB on it's outgoing path. There is not such thing as an interface
being "In" a FIB. All interfaces are still
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
I think you are rather confused about what Multiple FIBs is..
All it is is teh ability to make a packet use a particular
FIB on it's outgoing path. There is not such thing as an interface
being "In" a FIB. All i
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
>> > I think you are rather confused about what Multiple FIBs is..
>> > All it is is teh ability to make a packet use a particular
>> > FIB on it's outgoing path. There is not such thing as an interface
>> > being "In" a FIB. All interfaces are still visib
http://people.freebsd.org/~piso/libalias_mbuf.diff
this patch makes libalias able to handle mbuf: TOS, big MTU, much
less copy-around, etcetc.
I encourage people to test it, since i would like to commit it soon.
Known issues:
-documentation was not updated
-i didn't convert the fragment handli
Old Synopsis: ip_id not protected ...
New Synopsis: [udp] ip_id not protected ...
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 14 21:38:57 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/c
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:41:41PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
[snip]
>> We have about 3 months left to get that patch in for 8; ideally 6
>> weeks. Can you update the nat-t patch in a way as discussed here
>> before so that the extra a
Synopsis: [ppp] ppp can not set the correct interface with pptpd
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->bz
Responsible-Changed-By: bz
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 14 19:44:22 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
follow-ups to me.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122068
___
Synopsis: [ppp] host routes added by ppp with gateway flag (regression)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->bz
Responsible-Changed-By: bz
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 14 19:43:57 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
follow-ups to me.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=125079
> > I think you are rather confused about what Multiple FIBs is..
> > All it is is teh ability to make a packet use a particular
> > FIB on it's outgoing path. There is not such thing as an interface
> > being "In" a FIB. All interfaces are still visible to the routing code
> > by default, and The
Re^2...
> (...VRF...etc...pp...)
> - To go between VRFs you need to send the traffic to an external
> device, for instance a firewall.
That was my first line of thought but my way simply does not work like that.
Regards,
Peter.
--
Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s m
Re...
Thanks for the numerous responses, first time I feel like home :)
> >>> I have set up a box with various vlan interfaces on it. I naively
> >>> expected to be able to set individual "default" routes and route
> >>> between them via an *external* router (and filter packets there etc.)
> >>>
> Perhaps the OP should rephrase his desire.
>
> To me, it sounds like he wants to turn the FBSD box into a VLAN
> aggregator, and then "trunk" the VLANs to an external router to route
> between the VLAN subnets.
It's more that I'd like my FreeBSD box to be able to handle multiple
routing tables
Julian Elischer wrote:
> sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>>> I've poked about for weeks and asked similar questions in
>>> -questions and elsewhere without avail. Probably using the wrong keys
>>> to search and ask:
>>>
>>> I have set up a box with various vlan interfaces on it. I naively
>>> expected to
13 matches
Mail list logo
