On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> Ash Gokhale wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm developing a kernel module that will be doing inspection and needed
>>> access to raw network frames,
>>> so I turned to netgraph as the solution.Howev
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ash Gokhale wrote:
>>
>> I'm developing a kernel module that will be doing inspection and needed
>> access to raw network frames,
>> so I turned to netgraph as the solution.However it seems that netgraph
>> will not permit a module
>> t
On Mar 25, 2009, at 12:40 AM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:59:22PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
In article <41d96b7f-f76d-4f35-ba1d-0edf810e6...@young-alumni.com>,
"Chris" writes:
True OR False
1) NDIS only works with XP drivers.
Can't answer that as I've never needed
Sam Leffler 2009-03-28:
> Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
> > Is anyone already working on porting Damien Bergamini's
> > updates to OpenBSD iwn(4) in order to support Intel 5100/5300
> > chipsets? Is there anything preventing this work (except
> > ENOTIME)?
>
> I've been working with another person
Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Is anyone already working on porting Damien Bergamini's updates
to OpenBSD iwn(4) in order to support Intel 5100/5300 chipsets?
Is there anything preventing this work (except ENOTIME)?
I've been working with another person on this. It looks like the mods
are str
Is anyone already working on porting Damien Bergamini's updates
to OpenBSD iwn(4) in order to support Intel 5100/5300 chipsets?
Is there anything preventing this work (except ENOTIME)?
--
Daniel Roethlisberger
http://daniel.roe.ch/
___
freebsd-net@freeb
