kalin m wrote:
hi all...
just looking for a few pointers for setting up a sms gateway.
if somebody would like to share some knowledge on successfully
implemented hardware (gprs/gsm/edge modems/drivers) and software like
kannel, smstools, etc...
for example i just talked to a salesperson at
kalin m wrote:
hi all...
just looking for a few pointers for setting up a sms gateway.
if somebody would like to share some knowledge on successfully
implemented hardware (gprs/gsm/edge modems/drivers) and software like
kannel, smstools, etc...
for example i just talked to a salesperson at
hi all...
just looking for a few pointers for setting up a sms gateway.
if somebody would like to share some knowledge on successfully
implemented hardware (gprs/gsm/edge modems/drivers) and software like
kannel, smstools, etc...
for example i just talked to a salesperson at a company called
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> >
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
> >>
> >> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
> >> I
On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
>>
>> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
>> I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
>>
>> To OP, could you try 7 STABLE
My bad - didn't send to list. See below.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kurt Buff
Date: Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: NATT patch and FreeBSD's setkey
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, VANHULLEBUS Yva
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
>
> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
> I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
>
> To OP, could you try 7 STABLE after 31 Jan? I guess it should not
> change a
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Hi,
I've asked this a week ago on the -ipfw list, but got no
reply ... The -net list might be more appropriate.
I'll have to implement a packet filter on machines with
several cores (4 to 8). Which one of the available filters
(IPFW, IPF, PF) will provide the best perform
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
To OP, could you try 7 STABLE after 31 Jan? I guess it should not
change anything but you never know.
--
Paul
Hi folk, some one know where can i found the oficial documentation of
Libnet 1.1.x ? or may be an tuto of it ?
Thanks a lot.
--
"Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX".
"Social Engineer -> Because there is no patch for human stupidity"
"The Unix Guru's View of
Hi,
I've asked this a week ago on the -ipfw list, but got no
reply ... The -net list might be more appropriate.
I'll have to implement a packet filter on machines with
several cores (4 to 8). Which one of the available filters
(IPFW, IPF, PF) will provide the best performance on such
SMP machin
Hi,
Check the ipfw(8) manual (includes examples) or rather go for pf
(packetfilter) and check the pf.conf(5) manual. For pf you just need to add
something like "antispoof for lo0".
Regards,
Adrian.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Blog Tieng Viet wrote:
> Dear all.
> I am a newbie of FreeBSD,
Old Synopsis: ndis keeps dropping the link
New Synopsis: [ndis] ndis keeps dropping the link
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 17 17:20:32 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.fr
Dear all.
I am a newbie of FreeBSD, would like to get alot of information about FreeBSD
such as IPFW.
I am annoyed by IP spoofing but dont have any way to prevent it.
Can any one tell me how to do ?
Thanks in advance.
PS:
I am using 6.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-PRERELEASE.
The FreeBSD box is used f
On 2009.02.14 17:23:42, Jason Morgan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been having trouble maintaining a wireless connection at my
> university, which uses the WPA-EAP protocol. I have played with my
> wpa_supplicant.conf file, but haven't found anything that works. I
> don't seems to have any trouble
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
Hi,
If someone has a magic solution without drawbacks, please tell us !
I am not going to find my posting from a few years back but the
solution is to keep the kernel and libipsec (and setkey) in base in
sync and not install libipsec and setkey fro
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:48:06PM +0200, Riaan Kruger wrote:
> I see a lot of good work done on the nat-t patches for FreeBSD and
> ipsec-tools.
That's what we're trying to do, even if we know that there is still
some work to do !
> I was wondering if the base setkey is due for an update?
> If
I see a lot of good work done on the nat-t patches for FreeBSD and ipsec-tools.
I was wondering if the base setkey is due for an update?
If so is anyone looking to update it?
Has anyone had any success using the patched FreeBSD along with racoon2.
Regards
Riaan
_
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
if_sr and if_ar are really simple and could probably be converted
"trivially".. especially if their netgraph code is used.
however I wonder if anyone still has that hardware (they are drivers for
two sync serial cards).
I still have such Digi/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>> (Bcc to arch@)
>>
>> On Mon, 26 May 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>> Just to keep track of things:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT
>>
>> Delayed by about six months, the merge and
I have the same problem with netgraph on 7.1-RELEASE, mpd 5.2, AMD Phenom.
Dummynet, divert and pf
are disabled in the kernel.
While swi1:net (aka netgraph) is using 100% of CPU time m_tag_locate() and
ng_iface_output()
are constantly called from the infinite loop.
Sergey, could you provide the c
21 matches
Mail list logo
