jmaps-fbsd...@fireburns.net wrote:
I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the
top 50 results on google... I can't find anything that'll actually
make this work.
yes this i stricky for several reasons
My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps
dow
Len Gross wrote:
>
> If I change the MTU on 192.168.1.1 to 1450 and the corresponding MTU
> on 192.168.1.2 to 1450, then Web Browsing on FreeBSD2 continues to
> work, BUT browsing on FreeBSD3 "fails" (mostly.)
You are running into a common TCP methodology in use these days, called
"Path MTU Disco
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:18:09 jmaps-fbsd...@fireburns.net wrote:
> I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the top 50
> results on google... I can't find anything that'll actually make this work.
>
> My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps down.
I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the top 50 results
on google... I can't find anything that'll actually make this work.
My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps down. In
despiration I signed up for comcast to use for bulk traffic.
Thus, I wa
Julian Elischer wrote:
I have set up a pair of machines which I can boot into either
VIMAGE_GLOBAL or normal kernels (otherwise identical).
with GB (bge) interfaces between them.
I am looking for suggestions as to what tests I should be doing
between these machines to be able to assess whether
I have set up a pair of machines which I can boot into either
VIMAGE_GLOBAL or normal kernels (otherwise identical).
with GB (bge) interfaces between them.
I am looking for suggestions as to what tests I should be doing
between these machines to be able to assess whether there are any
performan
Ian,
Thanks so much for taking the time to look at this problem.
I do not have any firewall running on any of the machines, unless
something "auto enables." The only rc.conf entries are ifconfig and
routing.
The thing that is most puzzling to me is that everything is fine on
FreeBSD #2 even th
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
BIND on my new router (7.1-STABLE, BIND 9.4.3-P1) shows bunch of
errors on every start and doesn't answer on requests for 30-60 seconds
after that. Errors are like this:
Jan 24 12:18:12 gateway named[1455]:
/usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/unix/socke
"No buffer space available" is ENOBUFS. This error is returned when
the ifq is full - see IFQ_ENQUEUE in if_var.h. You'll almost certainly
want to set ifq_len to larger than the default for a 10 gigabit
driver. This most likely to be a combination of ifq_len being too
small and inadequate txq overf
--- On Mon, 1/26/09, g...@freebsd.org wrote:
> From: g...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: freebsd 7.0-RELEASE BUG ping: sendto: No buffer space available
> To: "Rui Paulo"
> Cc: "Liran Liss" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Yony
> Yossef" , jo...@nocrew.org, "Amit Krig"
> , "Eitan Shefi"
> Date: Mo
In message <497b9ff4.30...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes:
> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Freebsd-stable.
> >
> > BIND on my new router (7.1-STABLE, BIND 9.4.3-P1) shows bunch of
> > errors on every start and doesn't answer on requests for 30-60 seconds
> > after that. Errors are like th
Hello, Freebsd-stable.
BIND on my new router (7.1-STABLE, BIND 9.4.3-P1) shows bunch of
errors on every start and doesn't answer on requests for 30-60 seconds
after that. Errors are like this:
Jan 24 12:18:12 gateway named[1455]:
/usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/unix/socket
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 24 января 2009 г., 13:37:33:
> IP addresses are RANDOM and DIFFERENT on every restart. These IP
> addresses are not mentioned in ANY config file on my computer, and
> addresses on my network interfaces IS NOT from these networks.
Ok, I'm stupid, it is root servers. Ok. Bu
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sunday 25 January 2009 11:43:48 Mark Andrews wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
> > > I've never used mpd myself, but you might want to try adding the
> > > following line to /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mpd and see if it helps:
> > >
> > > # BEFORE: named
On Saturday 24 January 2009 21:07:33 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> BIND on my new router (7.1-STABLE, BIND 9.4.3-P1) shows bunch of
> errors on every start and doesn't answer on requests for 30-60 seconds
> after that. Errors are like this:
>
> Jan 24 12:18:12 gateway named[1455]:
> /usr/src/lib/bind/
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-stable.
>
> BIND on my new router (7.1-STABLE, BIND 9.4.3-P1) shows bunch of
> errors on every start and doesn't answer on requests for 30-60 seconds
> after that. Errors are like this:
It's not necessary or desirable to paste in so many examples of the
s
Hello, Daniel.
You wrote 24 января 2009 г., 15:10:24:
>> Also, mpd5 creates two NG interfaces (ng0 and ng1) on startup to connect
>> to two providers.
>>
>> But previous installation (on faster hardware) doesn't show these
>> errors at all!
> I think this is an mpd problem - I had the same issue
On Sunday 25 January 2009 11:43:48 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > I've never used mpd myself, but you might want to try adding the
> > following line to /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mpd and see if it helps:
> >
> > # BEFORE: named
>
> mpd should also be fixed as the error code being returned is not
> approprate.
At Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:20:06 +,
Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Jan 2009, at 12:54, Yony Yossef wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm facing a temporary network hang on my interfaces following a flood
> > ping/stress udp test.
> >
> > I'm running a netperf UDP test which is giving results but does n
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:12:32AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
[]
> >Ipsec-tools team has still not decided how such compatibility issues
> >will be handled (or not...), any (good) idea is welcome !
>
> While this seems to be a big concern and there is compat breakage with
> this patchset alr
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
while cleaning up protosw things I found that rip6_output was most
likely never called from pr_output and after a short talk with Robert
the conclusion was that the same had been true for rip_output.
Before I am going to remove the initializations
22 matches
Mail list logo