I have frequent panics in dummynet module:
Dec 12 08:27:58 chip syslogd: restart
Dec 12 08:27:58 chip syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Dec 12 08:27:58 chip kernel:
Dec 12 08:27:58 chip kernel:
Dec 12 08:27:58 chip kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Dec 12 08:27:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 05:40:03AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/129580; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: "Glen Barber"
> To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: kern/129580: [ndis] Netgear WG311v3 (ndis) causes kenel
Hello everyone.
Im trying to create a system call similar to getdirentries().
When compiling the module, i get the following error:
ReadMod.c:160: warning: implicit declaration of function 'VOP_READDIR'
I have included all the required header files.
#include
#include
#include
Any help will
The following reply was made to PR kern/129580; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Glen Barber"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/129580: [ndis] Netgear WG311v3 (ndis) causes kenel trap at
boot.
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:04:10 -0500
As it turns out,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Sean Thomas Caron wrote:
> Hi Kip,
>
> I am currently using NATM on FreeBSD/sparc64 with FORE PCA-200E boards. It
> is a little buggy but it works and I am hoping to continue along with it as
> long as I can. :)
Hi Sean,
Thanks for the prompt response. Are you run
Hi Kip,
I am currently using NATM on FreeBSD/sparc64 with FORE PCA-200E
boards. It is a little buggy but it works and I am hoping to continue
along with it as long as I can. :)
-Sean
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:04:47AM +0100, Mam Ruoc wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >If you use vge(4) kernel module, rebuilding vge(4) is enough.
> >If vge(4) is statically linked to kernel, rebuilding kernel is
> >necessary(i.e. not whole source tree).
>
> Sorry for being stupid, but I did
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
If you use vge(4) kernel module, rebuilding vge(4) is enough.
If vge(4) is statically linked to kernel, rebuilding kernel is
necessary(i.e. not whole source tree).
Sorry for being stupid, but I did just install a clean install of
FreeBSD 7.0, kernel or driver only?
If d
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:53:22PM +0100, Mam Ruoc wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >I think there was a similar report. Would you show me the output of
> >"pciconf -lcv"?
>
> I finally got an SSD disk instead of the CF/IDE. The output is attached.
>
> >For a long time I wanted to clean up
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0300, Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:17:08PM +0300, Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
> > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > >Good. Would you show me the output of "pciconf -lcv"?
> > > >If I don't see any oddities in the outp
On Thursday 11 December 2008 18:54:29 Ferner Cilloniz wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I am interested in looking at the code for system calls in FreeBSD, like
> read, etc.
>
> In which directory can i find them? I have tried grepping /usr/src/sys.
src/sys/kern mostly ... "grep ^read *" should get you
Native ATM relies on the use of route cloning for managing virtual
circuits. Support for route cloning will be removed from the kernel in
the near future. I thus need to determine how many users of NATM there
are and their availability for testing changes.
Thanks,
Kip
_
Hello everyone.
I am interested in looking at the code for system calls in FreeBSD, like
read, etc.
In which directory can i find them? I have tried grepping /usr/src/sys.
Thanks :)
--
Cilloniz Bicchi, Ferner
Research Assistant
Dept. of Computer Sciences
The University of Texas at Austin
http
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
I think there was a similar report. Would you show me the output of
"pciconf -lcv"?
I finally got an SSD disk instead of the CF/IDE. The output is attached.
For a long time I wanted to clean up vge(4). Unfortunately the PCI
NIC I have seem to broken so I guess it's hard
Old Synopsis: Netgear WG311v3 (ndis) causes kenel trap at boot.
New Synopsis: [ndis] Netgear WG311v3 (ndis) causes kenel trap at boot.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Dec 11 22:22:26 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-W
I think that you're request to not monopolize the AF_INET slot is
reasonable. Do you intend to merge bms_netdev before 8 branches (I'm
guessing this coming summer)?
Cheers,
Kip
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just skimming this I notice it uses the if_afdata[
Hi,
Just skimming this I notice it uses the if_afdata[AF_INET] pointer
purely for lltbl purposes; this clashes with the IGMPv3 code drop.
Please look in the bms_netdev branch, where I introduce a 'struct
ip_ifinfo' to make more general use of that slot. IGMPv3 needs to store
per-interface st
Hi,
I am missing context of what Max's suggestion was, do you have a
reference to an old email thread?
Style bugs:
* needs style(9) and whitespace cleanup.
* C typedefs should be suffixed with _t for consistency with other
kernel typedefs.
* Function typedefs usually named like foo_func_t (s
Hello.
I have strange problem with ifconfig: I can't add ip address to interface:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] route get 195.3.245.xx
route to: 195.3.245.xx
destination: default
mask: default
gateway: gadget
interface: vlan10
flags:
recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msecrttvar ho
Ok recompiling now. Hopefully it works fine. I'll report back.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:39 AM
To: Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NAT-T + ipsec integration
On Thu, Dec 11, 2
On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:50:39 Randall Stewart wrote:
> All:
>
> Ok here is what I have come up with.. going along the
> lines of Max's suggestion.. its pretty clean I think.
>
> Comments would be most welcome..
>
> The only thing possibly a bit dodgy is that
>
> 1) UDP has no per-protocol b
All:
Ok here is what I have come up with.. going along the
lines of Max's suggestion.. its pretty clean I think.
Comments would be most welcome..
The only thing possibly a bit dodgy is that
1) UDP has no per-protocol block.
2) Instead of creating one, I am using the block pointer in the inp
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 04:02:01AM -0800, Gabe wrote:
> Hello all
Hi.
> Does anyone know how to enable nat traversal on freebsd?
>
> I've got a site to site ipsec tunnel setup but clients behind the
> nat can't vpn through it. Any help would be appreciated.
Actually, you can apply a patch to s
Hello all
Does anyone know how to enable nat traversal on freebsd?
I've got a site to site ipsec tunnel setup but clients behind the nat can't vpn
through it. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
/gabe
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
Hello,
I would like to create an ethernet over UDP tunnel. For my
purposes, using ng_bridge and ng_ksocket seem fine. The
problem is that the peer address/port is not known, since
it will be behind a NAT device and will have a dynamically
assigned IP address. In userspace I would use something li
25 matches
Mail list logo
