Hum when I do my Samba transfer, there is a lot of small files (> 50 000)
and it seems at some point Samba tops at 100% CPU usage on one core. Is it
possible the rl(4) driver could be influenced by high CPU load? With the
ale(4) driver, there's no problem but the Samba transfer becomes really slow
security wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:01 pm, security wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm building a WAN emulation box based on 7.1-beta2-ipfw and
>>> dummynet. The config is basically a router-on-a-stick. The server
>>> (FBSD rtr) has two nics which connect to two d
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?iso-8859-1?B?QXVy6WxpZW4gTely6Q==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marius Strobl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-bit PCI slot
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:01 pm, security wrote:
>
>> I'm building a WAN emulation box based on 7.1-beta2-ipfw and
>> dummynet. The config is basically a router-on-a-stick. The server
>> (FBSD rtr) has two nics which connect to two different switches,
>> but both switc
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 17:50:04 Marius Strobl wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien_M=E9r=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kern/128833: [b
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien_M=E9r=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-bit PCI slot
Da
Requested commands:
Before a problem happens:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sysctl hw.busdma
hw.busdma.total_bpages: 8260
hw.busdma.zone0.total_bpages: 8196
hw.busdma.zone0.free_bpages: 8196
hw.busdma.zone0.reserved_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.zone0.active_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.zone0.total_bounced: 0
hw.busdma.zon
One of the things that are making things hard for network testing is the
question
"what to do about tokenring support?"
We seem to have a dearth of tokenring users so we are completely unable
test how changes affect tokenring.
If anyone here knows anyone whoul could:
1/ help support tokenring
2
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:01 pm, security wrote:
>
>> I'm building a WAN emulation box based on 7.1-beta2-ipfw and
>> dummynet. The config is basically a router-on-a-stick. The server
>> (FBSD rtr) has two nics which connect to two different switches,
>> but both switc
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:01 pm, security wrote:
> I'm building a WAN emulation box based on 7.1-beta2-ipfw and
> dummynet. The config is basically a router-on-a-stick. The server
> (FBSD rtr) has two nics which connect to two different switches,
> but both switch ports are in the same untagg
I'm building a WAN emulation box based on 7.1-beta2-ipfw and dummynet.
The config is basically a router-on-a-stick. The server (FBSD rtr) has
two nics which connect to two different switches, but both switch ports
are in the same untagged interconnected vlan. All the other test boxes
in the netw
David DeSimone wrote:
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
switch (proto) {
case IPPROTO_GRE:
hlen += sizeof(struct gre_h);
+
+ m->m_flags &= ~(M_DECRYPTED);
+
Are there security implications from removing this flag?
That is a very good quest
Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> switch (proto) {
> case IPPROTO_GRE:
> hlen += sizeof(struct gre_h);
> +
> + m->m_flags &= ~(M_DECRYPTED);
> +
Are there security implications from removing this flag?
--
David DeSimone == Network Admin ==
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Robert Noland wrote:
Hi,
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnels seems to
work properly.
The reason for this to my knowledge is:
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvswe
I'll come back to you tonight with the output of sysctl and netstat but
there was no message with dmesg. Not sure about the console because no
screen is plugged in this computer. My client computer's Samba started to
output a lot of timeout and read/write error with dmesg.
2008/11/17 Pyun YongHyeo
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Robert Noland wrote:
Hi,
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnels seems to
work properly.
The reason for this to my knowledge is:
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/freebsd2/sy
16 matches
Mail list logo
