Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21:00PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > > Hello, > > I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2 > based brand new notebook; I only used a 7-1Beta CD and > 7-STABLE on this thing. > > Scp-ing ports.tgz from a rock-stable 7-STABLE server to

Initialisation of a networking protocol

2008-09-28 Thread Ryan French
Hi everyone, I'm having a bit of trouble with my MPLS protocol code at the moment. I have the code written and compiling (mostly based on some OpenBSD code I was shown) but when an MPLS packet is received it doesnt appear as thou my mpls_input routine is being called. I believe this is because I h

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over > >

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over > > 50GB > > from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossov

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread Gary Palmer
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over > 50GB > from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable > and > the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s.

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over > 50GB > from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable > and > the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s.

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

2008-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over 50GB from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable and the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s. Very odd. Did a tcpdump and saw lots of bad checksum errors. What other trou

Atheros releases ath5k HAL code

2008-09-28 Thread Cy Schubert
I'm not sure of the veracity of this but here it is anyway. http://lwn.net/Articles/300758/ -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FreeBSD UNIX: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org e**(i*pi)+1=0 ___ freeb

Re: kern/127644: [ndis] [panic] NDIS panic

2008-09-28 Thread weongyo
Synopsis: [ndis] [panic] NDIS panic Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->weongyo Responsible-Changed-By: weongyo Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Sep 28 09:47:01 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: grab it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127644 __