Hello!
I'm using FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (Jul 25) and I have two Internet
connections. Both are ethernet based, but one requires PPTP (2) while
another is direct with external IP address.
Trouble is that provider (1) of connection with external address is
limiting number of outgoing TCP connections (
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 11:22 +0530, Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke writes:
> > On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 03:26 +0530, Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Is there anyone, who is porting NetworkManager[1] to FreeBSD ? If yes, I
> >> would like to be a tester or co
On Monday 22 September 2008 12:22:09 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:38:02PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> > I might be wrong, but I don't think we ever supported rdr without
> > net.inet.ip.forwarding enabled. Maybe to a different local address, but
> > even then you'd need ne
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
And what about ipfw variant?
For the first (bridge) case ipfw didn't work at all. No packets were
redirected. I haven't tried for the gateway case, because pf works
there.
ipfw forwarding is disabled for bridge and L2 cases.
(I think the man page says so.)
At Iro
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:00:59PM +0300, Sergey Listopad wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am playing with bridge(4) stp feature.
>
> there are 2 boxes with 7.0-RELEASE-p4.
>
> rt1rt2
> ___ ___
> |
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:11:35PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:31:08PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> >
> >>So, could you draw you connections and related firewall rules. And the
> >>one you
> >>are trying to setup. I will also try to upd
Synopsis: [icmp]: icmp socket receives icmp replies not owned by the process.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rwatson
State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 22 14:22:16 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Request feedback based on correspondence to date -- the delivery of ICMP
messages to mu
Hi!
I am playing with bridge(4) stp feature.
there are 2 boxes with 7.0-RELEASE-p4.
rt1rt2
___ ___
|| ||
| |tap1| ---
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:31:08PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
So, could you draw you connections and related firewall rules. And the
one you
are trying to setup. I will also try to update the machine to the most
recent 7 to
see if my setup will stop working. Curre
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
I'm attempting to backport the iwn(4) driver for the Intel 4965 driver from
-HEAD to RELENG_7 and am getting stuck with it at one particular point: WPA
authentication times out.
As a followup to this, with a bit of help from Sam Leffler, I've now
su
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:31:08PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> So, could you draw you connections and related firewall rules. And the
> one you
> are trying to setup. I will also try to update the machine to the most
> recent 7 to
> see if my setup will stop working. Currently machine runs earl
Hi,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:38:02PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
I might be wrong, but I don't think we ever supported rdr without
net.inet.ip.forwarding enabled. Maybe to a different local address, but even
then you'd need net.inet.ip.check_interface=0. Looking a
Chris Buechler wrote:
This PR is bogus because:
ICMP has no concept of datagrams being "owned" by a process. There is
no field in the ICMP protocol which differentiates ICMP "sessions" on
a per-process basis, and this is because ICMP has no concept of
"sessions" -- ICMP messages are directed
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
The following reply was made to PR kern/127528; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/127528: [ic
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:38:02PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> I might be wrong, but I don't think we ever supported rdr without
> net.inet.ip.forwarding enabled. Maybe to a different local address, but even
> then you'd need net.inet.ip.check_interface=0. Looking at the code, I don't
> see wher
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Chris Buechler wrote:
This PR is bogus because: ICMP has no concept of datagrams being "owned" by
a process. There is no field in the ICMP protocol which differentiates ICMP
"sessions" on a per-process basis, and this is because ICMP has no concept
of "sessions" -- ICMP me
17 matches
Mail list logo
