On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Brian McGinty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day Kip,
>
>> I'm hoping to get to it some time in August. I'm a bit behind in my
>> contracts at the moment.
>
> A few weeks ago, I did a quick comparison of the driver between
> FreeBSD and Linux, and found quite a few
G'day Kip,
> I'm hoping to get to it some time in August. I'm a bit behind in my
> contracts at the moment.
A few weeks ago, I did a quick comparison of the driver between
FreeBSD and Linux, and found quite a few differences that's worth
pulling over. The guy from Intel working on FreeBSD, Jack?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Brian McGinty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Brian
>> I very much doubt that this is ceteris paribus. This is 384 random IPs
>> -> 384 random IP addresses with a flow lookup for each packet. Also,
>> I've read through igb on Linux - it has a lot of optimizations
On Saturday 19 July 2008 14:44:02 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> The controller definitely supports jumbo frames.
What proof do you have of this?
> I guess another question to ask would be if the newer kernel sources in
> freebsd-stable have support for jumbo frames on the MCP67 in the nfe
> driver.
No
I have an mcp67 nforce networking controller using the nfe driver. I
currently cannot set my MTU to anything higher than 1500. The controller
definitely supports jumbo frames. Is there any hope of the BSD driver
supporting it? I'm more than willing to test things out.
I guess another question
Synopsis: [carp][lagg] CARP combined with LAGG causes system panic - 7.0/amd64
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: gonzo
State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 19 13:23:55 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
I'll take it.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->gonzo
Responsible-Changed-By:
