Re: connect(): Operation not permitted

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Kian Mohageri wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp]

I tried all of this :/ still, 256/512 descriptors seem to work the best. Happy to let you log into the machine and fiddle around if you want :) Paul Ingo Flaschberger wrote: Dear Paul, what could cause this? *) kern.polling.idle_poll enabled? *) kern.polling.user_frac ? *) kern.polling.reg

Re: kern/125258: socket's SO_REUSEADDR option does not work

Synopsis: socket's SO_REUSEADDR option does not work Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 4 14:50:44 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: reassign to -net http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=125258

Re: kern/125195: fxp(4) driver failed to initialize device Intel 82801DB

Synopsis: fxp(4) driver failed to initialize device Intel 82801DB Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 4 14:50:18 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reassign to -NET http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=125195

Re: connect(): Operation not permitted

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:32:13AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote: > > A similar/related problem was addressed in OpenBSD 4.3 > > (http://www.openbsd.org/plus43.html). > > > > * In pf(4), allow state reuse if both sides are in FIN_WA

Re: connect(): Operation not permitted

On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kian Mohageri wrote: > >> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >>> > >>>

Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp]

Dear Paul, what could cause this? *) kern.polling.idle_poll enabled? *) kern.polling.user_frac ? *) kern.polling.reg_frac ? *) kern.polling.burst_max ? *) kern.polling.each_burst ? I tried tons of different values for these and nothing made any significant difference. Idle polling makes a

Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp]

ngo Flaschberger wrote: Dear Paul, Opteron UP mode, no polling input (em0) output packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls 1071020 0 66403248 2 0404 0 that looks good. (but seems to be near the limit). Yes

Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp]

Dear Paul, Opteron UP mode, no polling input (em0) output packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls 1071020 0 66403248 2 0404 0 that looks good. (but seems to be near the limit). Polling turned on provided be