On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:01:46 -0500
mgrooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone currently looking at the IPsec NAT-T patches? I posted a similar
> question several months ago around the FAST_IPSEC + IPv6 integration time
> frame. Maybe now that things have settled a bit, this work can be reviewe
All,
Is anyone currently looking at the IPsec NAT-T patches? I posted a similar
question several months ago around the FAST_IPSEC + IPv6 integration time
frame. Maybe now that things have settled a bit, this work can be reviewed
and possibly committed?
Thanks,
-Matthew
Hi Erik,
Am Di, 24.06.2008, 23:26, schrieb Erik Osterholm:
> Can anyone tell me if there are good reasons for explicitly leaving
> ALTQ out of the kernel? More specific to my circumstances, if I'm
> building kernels to be installed on every machine we deploy, is it
> worth building a separate ker
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me if there are good reasons for explicitly leaving
ALTQ out of the kernel? More specific to my circumstances, if I'm
building kernels to be installed on every machine we deploy, is it
worth building a separate kernel for ALTQ for those few boxes which
will require it?
Ar
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Paul wrote:
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=128000
changed - no effect
if this is udp or some datagram traffic then it is telling you
that the interface queue has filled up..
Check output from netstat -m, this shows network buffers.
770/8200/8970 mbufs in use (current/cache/
2574 output packets discarded due to no route
2904 output datagrams fragmented
5808 fragments created
not incrementing..
route monitor:
got message of size 160 on Tue Jun 24 10:59:04 2008
RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 160, pid: 0, seq 0, errno
0, flags:
lo
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:58:30 +0300
Subject: jboss4 on freebsd
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm experimenting with jboss4 cluster under freebsd 7 (amd64).
> In my configuration I have 2 jboss instances whic
Paul wrote:
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=128000
changed - no effect
Check output from netstat -m, this shows network buffers.
770/8200/8970 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
768/5426/6194/128000 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
768/5248 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in u
Greetings,
I'm experimenting with jboss4 cluster under freebsd 7 (amd64).
In my configuration I have 2 jboss instances which are in cluster and
they communicate via separate network (used only for shared data)
When I create some load on the application sometimes I see this error:
2008-06-24 14
Old Synopsis: EEPROM corruption with Compaq NC3163 NIC
New Synopsis: [fxp] EEPROM corruption with Compaq NC3163 NIC
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jun 24 08:14:04 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reclassify.
h
10 matches
Mail list logo
