Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Niki Denev
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think if_ether.c would be good, where arp_ifinit() is. > Here is what i've come up with (some comments after the patch) : diff -ur /usr/src/.zfs/snapshot/orig/sys/net/if.c /usr/src/sys/net/if.c --- /usr/src/.zfs/snapshot/or

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Max Laier
On Thursday 22 May 2008 00:14:37 Niki Denev wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:22:52 Niki Denev wrote: > >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Looks good, though I'd probably mov

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Niki Denev
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:22:52 Niki Denev wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Looks good, though I'd probably move up the _INVOKE to before the >> > ARPs are sent out. Prob

Re: netatm removal warning

2008-05-21 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Robert Watson wrote: This is another of those boring e-mails about kernel subsystems that still require Giant. Sorry about that! As previously published, netatm is a non-MPSAFE protocol stack largely superseded by our two other ATM stacks, netnatm and the netgraph/atm (

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:22:52 Niki Denev wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks good, though I'd probably move up the _INVOKE to before the > > ARPs are sent out. Probably between twiddling the hardware and > > sending ARPs (though that needs

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Niki Denev
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks good, though I'd probably move up the _INVOKE to before the ARPs are > sent out. Probably between twiddling the hardware and sending ARPs > (though that needs an else-case if the interface is still down). In fact > the

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 22:44:42 Niki Denev wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It doesn't (and shouldn't have to). I'd simply add an > >> EVENTHANDLER_INVOKE(ifaddr_event, ifp) to if_setlladdr() - we do > >> that for INET[6] address already. Then

Re: [em][panic] recursed on non-recursive mutex em0

2008-05-21 Thread Jack Vogel
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Neil Hoggarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> I opened PR kern/122928 last month, describing my problems with Intel >> PRO/1000 MT adaptor on 7-STABLE, with v6.7.3 of the em driv

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Niki Denev
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It doesn't (and shouldn't have to). I'd simply add an >> EVENTHANDLER_INVOKE(ifaddr_event, ifp) to if_setlladdr() - we do that for >> INET[6] address already. Then vlan (and any other device interested in >> LLaddress change

Re: [em][panic] recursed on non-recursive mutex em0

2008-05-21 Thread Jack Vogel
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Neil Hoggarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I opened PR kern/122928 last month, describing my problems with Intel > PRO/1000 MT adaptor on 7-STABLE, with v6.7.3 of the em driver: every > so often the machine would get into a state where it would repeat

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Niki Denev
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 19:31:46 Niki Denev wrote: >> If one tries to use lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg0 interface configured >> from rc.conf it does't work. >> The problem is that all of the cloned interfaces (lagg0 , lagg0.2,

[em][panic] recursed on non-recursive mutex em0

2008-05-21 Thread Neil Hoggarth
Hi Folks, I opened PR kern/122928 last month, describing my problems with Intel PRO/1000 MT adaptor on 7-STABLE, with v6.7.3 of the em driver: every so often the machine would get into a state where it would repeatedly watchdog timeout the em0 interface, and the interface would stop receiving pac

Re: lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 19:31:46 Niki Denev wrote: > If one tries to use lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg0 interface configured > from rc.conf it does't work. > The problem is that all of the cloned interfaces (lagg0 , lagg0.2, etc) > are created before any other interface configuration is done, > and

lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg(4) interface

2008-05-21 Thread Niki Denev
If one tries to use lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg0 interface configured from rc.conf it does't work. The problem is that all of the cloned interfaces (lagg0 , lagg0.2, etc) are created before any other interface configuration is done, and in this case lagg0 is created, then lagg0.2 is created. But be

Re: kern/123123: [re][patch] Realtek RTL8111C detection and failure

2008-05-21 Thread rpaulo
Synopsis: [re][patch] Realtek RTL8111C detection and failure Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->rpaulo Responsible-Changed-By: rpaulo Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 21 10:36:18 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'm working on a patch since NetBSD seems to support this card. http://www.