hi
I'am also meet this problem in my mss server(missey streaming server).
one encoder push stream to mss, then run 100 client player playing the
sream, as the client number increase, mss will occur this error sooner or
later
like this:
I'am using kqueue, and will got a event with EV_EOF and ffl
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:18:54PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>This should provide a direct answer to you question of "why"? But I
> >>>suspect the underlying question is why divert sockets aren't s
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
This should provide a direct answer to you question of "why"? But I
suspect the underlying question is why divert sockets aren't supported
for IPv6. I don't know why.
because no=one has done it and because
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >This should provide a direct answer to you question of "why"? But I
> >suspect the underlying question is why divert sockets aren't supported
> >for IPv6. I don't know why.
>
> because no=one has done it and because divert socka
Synopsis: [nfe] [hang] "ifconfig nfe up" causes a hard system lockup in
7.0-RELEASE and 7.0-STABLE-042008
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 5 23:04:49 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
On May 4, 2008, at 6:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP protocol stack soure code to my own
OS kernel which is GPL Licence?
Modern 2- or 3-clause BSD licenses are fully compatible with the GPL,
as are most "simple, permissive" licenses like the MIT/X11, Zlib, and
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
This should provide a direct answer to you question of "why"? But I
suspect the underlying question is why divert sockets aren't supported
for IPv6. I don't know why.
because no=one has done it and because divert sockaddrs are ipv4 sockaddrs
you would have to ma
Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
Oh, I just had a thought, increase the RX processing limit,
that only allows you to process 100 packets in one pass.
First change it to 250 and see what it does, you might
also set it to -1 which will allow you to process til you
drain the ring, the r
At Sat, 3 May 2008 20:00:43 +1000,
Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before somebody shoots me down on it: I know that ipfw_divert() is
> not suitable for IPv6 packets.
[snip]
> which is what I expected. So why doesn't this get displayed for the
> IPv6 sockets?
I don't know much abou
Hi,
I am looking at the tcp_tw_2msl_scan() code and it looks like there is a
bug in there.
struct tcptw *
tcp_tw_2msl_scan(int reuse)
{
struct tcptw *tw;
INP_INFO_WLOCK_ASSERT(&tcbinfo);
for (;;) {
tw = TAILQ_FIRST(&twq_2msl);
i
Kip Macy wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 6:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all
Can I port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP protocol stack soure code to my own OS kernel
which is GPL Licence?
I know that 4.4BSD-Lite is BSD Licenced. Is it legal to port BSD Licenced code
and change it to GPL licenc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi, all
|
| Can I port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP protocol stack soure code to my own OS
kernel which is GPL Licence?
|
| I know that 4.4BSD-Lite is BSD Licenced. Is it legal to port BSD
Licenced code and change it to GPL licence?
For my own edification, unless you specifically mark a function
inline, will gcc really optimize them out? That seems a little
overboard unless there is some compiler option that says its okay to
do that. I guess that would be very easy to test if you do as you
say, just sock away the function ad
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 6:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> Can I port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP protocol stack soure code to my own OS
> kernel which is GPL Licence?
>
> I know that 4.4BSD-Lite is BSD Licenced. Is it legal to port BSD Licenced
> code and change it to GPL licence?
Yes
> Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 23:56:33 +0800
> From: kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi, all
> I want to port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP source code to my own OS kernel.
> My OS kernel is GPL licenced.
> Is it possible for me to modify 4.4BSD-Lite's source code and change
> its lice
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 05:51:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A new version of the em drivers went into the tree Friday.
>
> Yes but it also broke kernel builds if you don't add device igb. :)
Only for on
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:27:10AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> > > Yes, I'm building a debug kernel. I have the line listed above as
> > well
> > > as the following:
> > >
> > > options KDB
> > > options DDB
> > > options GDB
> > > options INVARIANTS
> > > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
>
> > Yes, I'm building a debug kernel. I have the line listed above as
> well
> > as the following:
> >
> > options KDB
> > options DDB
> > options GDB
> > options INVARIANTS
> > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
> > options WITNESS
> > options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
>
> Dave:
>
> What symbols can you n
Hi, all
I want to port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP source code to my own OS kernel.
My OS kernel is GPL licenced.
Is it possible for me to modify 4.4BSD-Lite's source code and change its
licence from 4.4BSD-Lite licence to GPL licence?
BR
Kevin Wu
___
freebsd-
Hi, all
I want to port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP source code to my own OS kernel.
My OS kernel is GPL licenced.
Is it possible for me to modify 4.4BSD-Lite's source code and change its
licence from 4.4BSD-Lite licence to GPL licence?
BR
Kevin Wu
___
freebsd-
Hi, all
I want to port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP source code to my own OS kernel.
My OS kernel is GPL licenced.
Is it possible for me to modify 4.4BSD-Lite's source code and change its
licence from 4.4BSD-Lite licence to GPL licence?
BR
Kevin Wu
___
freebsd
Hi, all
Can I port 4.4BSD-Lite's TCP/IP protocol stack soure code to my own OS kernel
which is GPL Licence?
I know that 4.4BSD-Lite is BSD Licenced. Is it legal to port BSD Licenced code
and change it to GPL licence?
Kevin Wu
___
freebsd-net@freebsd
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 05:51:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A new version of the em drivers went into the tree Friday.
Yes but it also broke kernel builds if you don't add device igb. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CB
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:49:38PM +0400 I heard the voice of
Igor Zinovik, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs
> Coll
> ed01500 00:80:48:c6:a1:82 35885806 4 23583716 0
> 134590 ...
>
> So i have three questions:
In response to Igor Zinovik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello, net@ readers.
>
> I'm relatively new to freebsd networking so i'm asking here, because i
> did not found information in man netstat. I have a machine that suffers
> from collisions.
>
> Network interface status:
> NameMtu Ne
Hello, net@ readers.
I'm relatively new to freebsd networking so i'm asking here, because i
did not found information in man netstat. I have a machine that suffers
from collisions.
Network interface status:
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs Coll
Jack Vogel wrote:
Oh, I just had a thought, increase the RX processing limit,
that only allows you to process 100 packets in one pass.
First change it to 250 and see what it does, you might
also set it to -1 which will allow you to process til you
drain the ring, the risk is that you cause other
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o kern/35442 net[sis] [patch] Problem transmitting runts in if_sis dri
a kern/38554 netchang
28 matches
Mail list logo
