On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:25:13PM +0300, Oleg wrote:
> Hi, sorry for long delay, was too busy.
> So, I recheck return code of bus_dmamap_load(9) and its exactly ENOMEM.
> Here are fresh patch with your suggestions (diff with HEAD)
>
Patch committed with minor changes(if_bfe.c rev 1.45).
Than
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
A general purpose OS is a different beast as it has no physical
equivalent of the FIB. It may have multiple routing tables, though, to
I think setrib would be a term less likely to cause confusion then
setfib even though, in the case of your FreeBS
Julian Elischer wrote:
A general purpose OS is a different beast as it has no physical
equivalent of the FIB. It may have multiple routing tables, though, to
I think setrib would be a term less likely to cause confusion then
setfib even though, in the case of your FreeBSD patches, it's really
bo
Julian Elischer wrote:
The interaction with routing daemons is something I don't know
enough about. I need someone who knows routing daemons to tell
how to correctly tweek code that sends routing events.
As long as it doesn't break anything...
I think it is possible that events from a partic
Synopsis: [bge] [patch] Broadcom 5906 not handled by FreeBSD
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: jhb
State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 29 19:48:06 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Patch committed to HEAD with minor tweaks.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->jhb
Responsible-Change
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:44:18 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The patch can be found at
http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt.diff
(or http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt6.diff for RELENG_6)
or source can be taken from perforce at
-net added to broaden the conversation
Paul wrote:
The routing daemons run linked separate instances and create their own
RIB. Take a look at Cisco's VRF implementation. You can even have
interfaces assigned to the other routing instance so you could have
em0.001 on routing instance 1 and e
Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:19:14 Julian Elischer wrote:
Paul wrote:
I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting
for :
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:19:14 Julian Elischer wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> > I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
> > routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
> > FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting
> > for :) M
Synopsis: [re] CARP messages filtered by Realtek driver on > 6.2 (regression)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->gavin
Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 29 18:13:53 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll try and get further info from the submitter.
To submitt
Paul wrote:
I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting for :)
Mainly to use with BGP , having multiple BGP routing tables. I would
l
I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting for :)
Mainly to use with BGP , having multiple BGP routing tables. I would
like it to be
Hi, sorry for long delay, was too busy.
So, I recheck return code of bus_dmamap_load(9) and its exactly ENOMEM.
Here are fresh patch with your suggestions (diff with HEAD)
Best Regards,
Oleg Dolgov.
2008/4/17, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:43:53AM +0300, quad
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to implement Large Recieve Offload for an
> >>>
> >> Ethernet driver
> >>
> >>> on FreeBSD 6.3, but all my >MTU packets are being thrown
> by the OS.
> >>> I'm using mbuf chains in this imlpementation, each mbuf is
> >>>
> >> a cluster
> >>
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:44:30AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>A little progress report
>From a recently installed (6.3) machine (plus patches)
Ok, being ignorant to this, possibly a silly question:
Why would i want or need multiple routing tables ?
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Leffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:17 PM
> To: Yehonatan Yossef
> Cc: Tom Judge; Mr Y; freebsd-net@freebsd.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Liran Liss
> Subject: Re: OS throws away large packets
>
> Yehonatan Yossef wrote:
> >
Yehonatan Yossef wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tom Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:21 PM
To: Mr Y
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OS throws away large packets
Mr Y wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to implement Large Rec
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:21 PM
> To: Mr Y
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: OS throws away large packets
>
> Mr Y wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to implement Large Recieve Off
The following reply was made to PR kern/123166; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [Fwd: RE: kern/123166: [re] CARP messages filtered by Realtek
driver on > 6.2]
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:29 +0100
Forwarde
The patch can be found at
http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt.diff
(or http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt6.diff for RELENG_6)
or source can be taken from perforce at:
//depot/user/julian/routing/src
a kernel needs to be created with the option ROUTETABLES=N
e.g.
+optionsROUTETAB
20 matches
Mail list logo
