You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
[1]http://annapurna.ifj.edu.pl/~jolanta/cgi-bin/postcard.exe
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at
George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
[snip]
I believe that a better solution is possible, but it will take more
careful study. One option is to start adding drain routines to UDP
that cause the protocol to drop packets under load, which is the
problem we're seeing. In our tests the server process cann
At Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:40:26 -0700,
Chris Pratt wrote:
>
> I am very interested in this topic as I've been waiting
> since moving from FreeBSD 5 in 2006. The workaround
> in the errata had no effect and the only notice I
> could see of something changing was the errata did
> not include the proble
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Alexander Sack wrote:
Here are my results:
Good news:
Well after fiddling around with it, it seems if I bump the number of
rx_bds to 512, disable polling, and use net.isr.direct=1, bge does not
drop packets anymore (as verified by assigning a counter within
bge_ticks() whe
We use the following for line rate gig capture on em's so you should be safe to
increase from 1048576.
net.bpf.maxbufsize=20971520
net.bpf.bufsize=20971520
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Sack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Packets still get dropped but this time by BPF. It seems I push
> I apologize for not yet reviewing all the code. I take that last bit
> to mean the drivers can reach up into sockets given those functions?
> I gather this is due to the work necessary to implement RDMA over TCP?
>
TOE for obvious reasons uses the existing socket infrastructure for
integrati
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:00:04 -0700,
>
> Kip Macy wrote:
> >
> > I would like to MFC TOE and RDMA support in the last week of May /
> > first week of June. My primary objective is that it be present in 7.1.
> > The re team has not y
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So the million dollar question: Do you believe that if I disable
> > DEVICE_POLLING and use interrupt driven I/O, I could achieve zero
> > packet loss over a 1Gbps link? This is the main issue I need to solve
> > (solve m
Christopher Arnold wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Vincent Mialon wrote:
I'm in a six months placement at Gitoyen http://www.gitoyen.net/ (a small
opensource-based LIR)
Gitoyen is a Local Internet Registry. The current routing solution is
based on Linux with Quagga running OSPF and BGP. All r
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:35:23PM -0700, vijay singh wrote:
> Hi all. How do we avoid a race in populating the ifindex_table? Id
> this is a TODO, as it seems from the code below, would it be
> acceptable if I wrote a patch and reused the ifnet_lock [IFNET_WLOCK,
> IFNET_WUNLOCK]?
Locking if_inde
On Apr 18, 2008, at 3:48 AM, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering why this patch was never committed? http://
people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelimit-workaround
As its name said, it's a workaround :)
I thought the bug was fixed by several ways, so the ol
It'll work fine. I've done this several times before.
However I've also had NAT implementations which didn't work this way but
this one should definitely work.
Baldur
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:25:50AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to configure a GIF IPIP tunnel from
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to configure a GIF IPIP tunnel from a FreeBSD box to a Cisco
router in order to route IPv6 blocks to a remote location.
However, I can't find good documentation to find out whether this will
work in behind a NAT device.
The FreeBSD box has a private IP, NAT'd 1:1. Th
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
So we are looking for a tool that inject and verify packet with faked
IPs. We want to generate fake traffic between A-B A-C B-C in both
directions.
The aim is to evaluate the routing capacity of openbgpd/freebsd.
We currently didn't find any tool that fit our needs. D
Christopher Arnold wrote:
Anyone looing at supporting the netfpga card on FreeBSD?
I would love to do that project myself, my time is scarse right now.
I believe there was some interaction between other XORP members and the
NetFPGA people, although I don't know if this resulted in any outcome.
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Vincent Mialon wrote:
I'm in a six months placement at Gitoyen http://www.gitoyen.net/ (a small
opensource-based LIR)
Gitoyen is a Local Internet Registry. The current routing solution is
based on Linux with Quagga running OSPF and BGP. All routers runs
Linux from USB
Hello
I'm in a six months placement at Gitoyen http://www.gitoyen.net/ (a small
opensource-based LIR)
Gitoyen is a Local Internet Registry. The current routing solution is
based on Linux with Quagga running OSPF and BGP. All routers runs
Linux from USB flash drives but we think that FreeBSD c
Dear Pierre,
We are currently trying to migrate our AS from Linux/quagga to
NanoBSD/openbgpd.
We want to validate our model. Please find below the test platform we use:
__ __ __
| || | | |
| router A || router B | | router
Hi,
We are currently trying to migrate our AS from Linux/quagga to
NanoBSD/openbgpd.
We want to validate our model. Please find below the test platform we use:
__ __ __
| || | | |
| router A || router B | | router C |
|
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering why this patch was never committed?
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelimit-workaround
As its name said, it's a workaround :)
I thought the bug was fixed by several ways, so the old bug resurfaced?
It does seem to address
Hi,
I am wondering why this patch was never committed?
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelimit-workaround
It does seem to address an issue I'm seeing where processes get into
the zonelimit state through the use of mbufs (a high speed UDP packet
receiver) but even after network
Hi,
I noticed a strange issue with tap(4) and if_bridge(4) where the bridge
seems not to be forwarding frames.
6.3-RELEASE, btw.
I have this setup where I use the two to bootstrap QEMU virtual machines.
Up until now I've been using dhcpd for this. This has only ever worked
right for me if I
The following reply was made to PR kern/122839; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/122839: [multicast] FreeBSD 7 multicast routing problem
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:50:02 +0800
Thank you very mach for your response
23 matches
Mail list logo
