On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:28:04PM -0800, Juri Mianovich wrote:
> >"after 30 minutes of maxed dummynet rule, add X mbps
> >to the rule for every active TCP session, with a max
> >ceiling of Y mbps"
> >
> >and:
> >
> >"after 30 minutes of less than m
Old Synopsis: Panic in ether_input() with different NIC's.
New Synopsis: [panic] Panic in ether_input() with different NIC's.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 2 02:56:55 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over
Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-By: linimon
State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 2 02:44:10 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Note that feedback was received some time ago.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:39:57PM -0800, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
> --- Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Barney
> > Cordoba wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Barney,
> > > >
> > > > > I
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:28:04PM -0800, Juri Mianovich wrote:
>"after 30 minutes of maxed dummynet rule, add X mbps
>to the rule for every active TCP session, with a max
>ceiling of Y mbps"
>
>and:
>
>"after 30 minutes of less than max usage, subtract X
>mbps from the rule every Y minutes, with a
--- Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Barney
> Cordoba wrote:
> >
> > --- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Barney,
> > >
> > > > It seems absolutely ridiculous to buy such
> > > hardware
> > > > and not install a PCI
At 08:42 p.m. 01/03/2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> This patch changes the default ephemeral port range from 49152-65535
> to 1024-65535. This makes it harder for an attacker to guess the
> ephemeral ports (as the port number space is larger). Also, it makes
> the chances of port number collisions
Synopsis: panic: free: multiple frees
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: linimon
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 1 23:29:14 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback timeout (> 3 months).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=62374
_
Old Synopsis: TSO + natd -> slow outgoing tcp traffic
New Synopsis: [tcp] TSO + natd -> slow outgoing tcp traffic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 1 23:21:15 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintai
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
> --- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Barney,
> >
> > > It seems absolutely ridiculous to buy such
> > hardware
> > > and not install a PCIx or 4x PCIe card for another
> > > $100. or less. Saying a 1x is "
> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:34:27 -0200
> From: Fernando Gont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Folks,
>
> This patch changes the default ephemeral port range from 49152-65535
> to 1024-65535. This makes it harder for an attacker to guess the
> ephemeral ports (as the port num
--- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Barney,
>
> > It seems absolutely ridiculous to buy such
> hardware
> > and not install a PCIx or 4x PCIe card for another
> > $100. or less. Saying a 1x is "fast enough" is
> like
> > saying a Celeron is "fast enough".
>
> The box is a sm
--- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Barney,
>
> > It seems absolutely ridiculous to buy such
> hardware
> > and not install a PCIx or 4x PCIe card for another
> > $100. or less. Saying a 1x is "fast enough" is
> like
> > saying a Celeron is "fast enough".
>
> The box is a sm
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
Folks,
This patch changes the default ephemeral port range from 49152-65535 to
1024-65535. This makes it harder for an attacker to guess the ephemeral ports
(as the port number space is larger). Also, it makes the chances of port
number collisions s
Dear Barney,
It seems absolutely ridiculous to buy such hardware
and not install a PCIx or 4x PCIe card for another
$100. or less. Saying a 1x is "fast enough" is like
saying a Celeron is "fast enough".
The box is a small 1HE appliance and can boot from a CF-Card.
I trust them more than a "al
The following reply was made to PR kern/118975; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_Nystr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/118975: [bge] [patch] Broadcom 5906 not handled by FreeBSD
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:35:04 +0100
--- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Thats why my next router will be based at this
> box:
> >>
>
http://www.axiomtek.com/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
> >
> > Nice piece of hardware.
> > Don't like the 2.5" one disk option though.
> >
> > And not shure what to think of:
> >
Thats why my next router will be based at this box:
http://www.axiomtek.com/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
Nice piece of hardware.
Don't like the 2.5" one disk option though.
And not shure what to think of:
"Seven 10/100/1000Mbps (through PCI-E by one
interface) ports (RJ-45)"
Which seems to
--- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I have a 1.2Ghz Pentium-M appliance, with 4x
> 32bit, 33MHz pci intel e1000
> >> cards.
> >> With maximum tuning I can "route" ~400mbps with
> big packets and ~80mbps
> >> with 64byte packets.
> >> around 100kpps, whats not bad for a pci
Synopsis: [ate] [patch] Promiscuous mode of if_ate (arm) doesn't work
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 1 14:23:11 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c
Folks,
This patch changes the default ephemeral port range from 49152-65535
to 1024-65535. This makes it harder for an attacker to guess the
ephemeral ports (as the port number space is larger). Also, it makes
the chances of port number collisions smaller.
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
I have a 1.2Ghz Pentium-M appliance, with 4x 32bit, 33MHz pci
intel e1000 cards. With maximum tuning I can "route" ~400mbps
with big packets and ~80mbps with 64byte packets. around 100kpps,
whats not bad for a pci architecture.
To reach higher bandwiths, better busses
22 matches
Mail list logo
